Behave, hardly touched him. If that was the other way round you would be claiming dive.Shove in the back, blatant penalty, surprise surprise it's not given
They really need to sort this nonsense out. Anywhere else on the pitch, a fouls would be given.Shove in the back, blatant penalty, surprise surprise it's not given
I wouldn't though, I'd be calling the Bournemouth defender an idiotBehave, hardly touched him. If that was the other way round you would be claiming dive.
They really need to sort this nonsense out. Anywhere else on the pitch, a fouls would be given.
You really wouldn't because your blue specs are to strong so off you pop.I wouldn't though, I'd be calling the Bournemouth defender an idiot
Thanks for trying to tell me what I think though, off you pop
If it's so obviously corrupt why watch? Do you like WWF as well?And it’s a foul for the opposition, this threshold they speak of is just a disguise to manage results, throw in the go with the initial decision in favour of the team they want to win and its game management. Basically be trigger happy with the whistle for cartel clubs and we won’t intervene no matter how soft and never blow against them and we won’t interfere unless it’s so obvious that we have no option to inject some false sense of the rules legitimacy. Joke.
Rags as well to be fair.Cherries keeper having a blinder
Only you that seems to think it wasn't a pen..You really wouldn't because your blue specs are to strong so off you pop.
If it's so obviously corrupt why watch? Do you like WWF as well?
Only me in the world or only me in a partisan blue world?Only you that seems to think it wasn't a pen..
It was a push in the back..yeah I wear blue tinted glasses too..