President Trump

Hegseth's the one to worry about not Trump tbh. Trumps an idiot and can do lots of damage. Hegseth is something different though. Would Hegseth be next in line to Trump ? Not sure how that succession works in this crazy regime.
No
He’s 6th in line.
 
Last edited:
Hegseth's the one to worry about not Trump tbh. Trumps an idiot and can do lots of damage. Hegseth is something different though. Would Hegseth be next in line to Trump ? Not sure how that succession works in this crazy regime.
Nope.

Vance
Speaker of the house

Hegseth is 6th in line
 
Good, because he is another rapist, god fearing, racist tattoo wearing, gerrymandering, muslim hating, Crusades bating, Jesus complex maniac. Even his own mother has called him out. Thoroughly dangerous.
 
The ramblings of a petulant child, to think that this orange half-wit, bully is leading the free world! Hopefully things will change and soon!

Around six years ago, the UK's ambassador to the USA was a guy called Sir Kim Darroch. He was a career diplomat, as you'd expect, one of the most senior, able and well respected diplomats we have.

Unfortunately, somehow his confidential briefings to the Foreign office were leaked to the Daily Mail, which then published them. That made his position untenable, and shortly after he was recalled to the UK.

It is interesting, with the benefit of hindsight, to look at some of his observations on the Trump regime - whilst bearing in mind that this was before the Covid epidemic and was well into Trump's first term.

Here are some of the things he said:

"We really don't believe that this Administration is going to become substantially more normal; less dysfunctional, less unpredictable, less faction-riven, less diplomatically clumsy and inept"

"I don't think this Administration will ever look competent"

"It's unlikely that US policy on Iran is going to become more coherent any time soon"

"For a man who has risen to the highest office on the planet, President Trump radiates insecurity"

"The stories about White House knife fights are, we judge, mostly true: multiple sources and confirmed by our own White House contacts. This is a uniquely dysfunctional environment"

"'This 'America First' Administration could do some profoundly damaging things to the world trade system: such as denounce the WTO, tear up existing trade details, launch protectionist action, even against allies. It could further undermine international action on climate change, or further cut UN funding"

"[A Trump rally was] a sea of the now iconic red MAGA caps. The crowd looked almost exclusively white, with a pretty even mix of men and women, young and old: there were families in every stand. [...] As is standard at these rallies, the language was incendiary, and a mix of fact and fiction – hard to reconcile with Pence's remarks about governing for all Americans"

From time to time I feel genuinely proud of our civil service.
 
Hegseth's the one to worry about not Trump tbh. Trumps an idiot and can do lots of damage. Hegseth is something different though. Would Hegseth be next in line to Trump ? Not sure how that succession works in this crazy regime.
Pistol Pete you say?

Wholly unqualified and incredibly stupid. This is going to get people killed, and it won't be the bad guys.

 
What a fukin messed-up nation
Yup. I cannot stress enough how much of a bad idea this is. I mean, it's not like bases full of hundreds if not thousands of testosterone fuled young men aren't going to have the odd disagreement between themselves. Happens all the time, which judging by your username I'm sure you well know. Now he wants to allow them pretty much unfetterd access to firearms???

Mental!!!
 
Around six years ago, the UK's ambassador to the USA was a guy called Sir Kim Darroch. He was a career diplomat, as you'd expect, one of the most senior, able and well respected diplomats we have.

Unfortunately, somehow his confidential briefings to the Foreign office were leaked to the Daily Mail, which then published them. That made his position untenable, and shortly after he was recalled to the UK.

It is interesting, with the benefit of hindsight, to look at some of his observations on the Trump regime - whilst bearing in mind that this was before the Covid epidemic and was well into Trump's first term.

Here are some of the things he said:

"We really don't believe that this Administration is going to become substantially more normal; less dysfunctional, less unpredictable, less faction-riven, less diplomatically clumsy and inept"

"I don't think this Administration will ever look competent"

"It's unlikely that US policy on Iran is going to become more coherent any time soon"

"For a man who has risen to the highest office on the planet, President Trump radiates insecurity"

"The stories about White House knife fights are, we judge, mostly true: multiple sources and confirmed by our own White House contacts. This is a uniquely dysfunctional environment"

"'This 'America First' Administration could do some profoundly damaging things to the world trade system: such as denounce the WTO, tear up existing trade details, launch protectionist action, even against allies. It could further undermine international action on climate change, or further cut UN funding"

"[A Trump rally was] a sea of the now iconic red MAGA caps. The crowd looked almost exclusively white, with a pretty even mix of men and women, young and old: there were families in every stand. [...] As is standard at these rallies, the language was incendiary, and a mix of fact and fiction – hard to reconcile with Pence's remarks about governing for all Americans"

From time to time I feel genuinely proud of our civil service.
Shame the clowns in charge didn’t listen to him!
 
Around six years ago, the UK's ambassador to the USA was a guy called Sir Kim Darroch. He was a career diplomat, as you'd expect, one of the most senior, able and well respected diplomats we have.

Unfortunately, somehow his confidential briefings to the Foreign office were leaked to the Daily Mail, which then published them. That made his position untenable, and shortly after he was recalled to the UK.

It is interesting, with the benefit of hindsight, to look at some of his observations on the Trump regime - whilst bearing in mind that this was before the Covid epidemic and was well into Trump's first term.

Here are some of the things he said:

"We really don't believe that this Administration is going to become substantially more normal; less dysfunctional, less unpredictable, less faction-riven, less diplomatically clumsy and inept"

"I don't think this Administration will ever look competent"

"It's unlikely that US policy on Iran is going to become more coherent any time soon"

"For a man who has risen to the highest office on the planet, President Trump radiates insecurity"

"The stories about White House knife fights are, we judge, mostly true: multiple sources and confirmed by our own White House contacts. This is a uniquely dysfunctional environment"

"'This 'America First' Administration could do some profoundly damaging things to the world trade system: such as denounce the WTO, tear up existing trade details, launch protectionist action, even against allies. It could further undermine international action on climate change, or further cut UN funding"

"[A Trump rally was] a sea of the now iconic red MAGA caps. The crowd looked almost exclusively white, with a pretty even mix of men and women, young and old: there were families in every stand. [...] As is standard at these rallies, the language was incendiary, and a mix of fact and fiction – hard to reconcile with Pence's remarks about governing for all Americans"

From time to time I feel genuinely proud of our civil service.
That is very interesting reading, thank you.

It's at times like these where I'm actually grateful to be coming towards the latter stages of life and not just starting out. I really don't wish to be young again.

My wife says that I never actually was young! She's known me for nearly 40 of my 60 years, so she may well have a point.
 
Yup. I cannot stress enough how much of a bad idea this is. I mean, it's not like bases full of hundreds if not thousands of testosterone fuled young men aren't going to have the odd disagreement between themselves. Happens all the time, which judging by your username I'm sure you well know. Now he wants to allow them pretty much unfetterd access to firearms???

Mental!!!
A load of pissed up yanks strolling around a base with fire arms I worked with the wankers in Hong Kong Germany and the UK.
It won't end well next they will be taking them off base
 
If the average IQ is 100, then there has to be a person with a lower than 100 IQ for every person with a higher than 100 IQ.
My IQ says that's not true.

For every person like Trump you might need three reasonably smart people to make up for his dumbness.
 
Pistol Pete you say?

Wholly unqualified and incredibly stupid. This is going to get people killed, and it won't be the bad guys.

Have I got this right? Service personnel use their own guns brought into bases against standing orders and shoot comrades and Hegseth thinks the solution is to allow everyone to break the rules?

(What's the chances that the rules were originally brought in to stop soldiers shooting each other? Or to stop them shooting superior officers?)

Edit... I found the answer!

"The history of firearms restrictions on military bases is complex and evolves over time, driven by concerns about safety, security, and discipline. While specific regulations have varied across different eras and branches of the military, the general trend has been towards increased restrictions, particularly in response to incidents of violence or accidental shootings. Over time, the regulations have been refined to balance the need for security with the rights of service members."

 
Last edited:
Have I got this right? Service personnel use their own guns brought into bases against standing orders and shoot comrades and Hegseth thinks the solution is to allow everyone to break the rules?

(What's the chances that the rules were originally brought in to stop soldiers shooting each other? Or to stop them shooting superior officers?)

Edit... I found the answer!

"The history of firearms restrictions on military bases is complex and evolves over time, driven by concerns about safety, security, and discipline. While specific regulations have varied across different eras and branches of the military, the general trend has been towards increased restrictions, particularly in response to incidents of violence or accidental shootings. Over time, the regulations have been refined to balance the need for security with the rights of service members."

Are there any schools on base that should be fun!
 
I don’t feel good about saying it or that we’re in this position. It’s a bad time for the Western World.
1775228856123.png

California stands out as does New York.. that although they have good education systems and lots of businesses.. it's not all sunshine and rainbows.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top