The Green Party

The guy was already incapacitated. I don't agree with kicking mentally ill people in the head.

He had been tasered. What happens when people are electrocuted? Is it MET policy to kick people suspected of holding a bomb?

I totally get the desire for a knife wielding maniac to get a good shoeing. What I don't get is this insistence that there was no other way to disarm him. The clue is in the language.
These are some of the most unhinged comments I’ve ever seen.

A man stabbed two innocent people in an area prone to terrorist attacks (police officers are aware of this). He was tasered but kept holding the knife firmly, and there was no way to know what he might have had hidden on his body. In 99% of the countries in the world (even the ones you may view positively), that terrorist would have been shot dead.

Instead of praising the incredible work of these officers, who risked their own lives to save strangers, you two chose to attack them. And yes, don’t come with the nice talk claiming you didn’t attack them. By saying they should have treated the terrorist more gently, you are in fact attacking the entire police force that would have done exactly the same thing, because it was the right decision.

He had been tasered. What happens when people are electrocuted?”… “I don’t agree with kicking mentally ill people in the head”… Now get out of your fantasy bubble and watch a real world video:

... these comments can only come from someone who hates what is good and feels sympathy for what is bad. It’s like Stockholm syndrome embodied in a person

The need to feel sympathy for murderers (and would-be murderers) is so strong that you didn’t stop to consider that, in certain situations, electrocution is not enough to immobilize a person. Some people with high adrenaline levels, who have used CNS-stimulating drugs, or are experiencing a psychotic episode, may maintain full or partial control of their body even after being electrocuted. Even when struck by firearm bullets, some may remain in control for several seconds.

He fell after being shocked, but there’s no way for the officers to know how much control the criminal will have over his body. That’s why police must take additional actions beyond using a taser. If the suspect is still holding his weapon (a knife) after being electrocuted, officers MUST do whatever is necessary to take that knife from him in the safest way for themselves. And kicking proved to be an effective way to achieve that.

It’s incredibly easy to find videos and news stories of people who were electrocuted or even shot multiple times and still kept going. You wanted these officers to risk their own lives even more just to provide gentle treatment to someone who would have killed them if given the chance.

You can deny it, and you probably will, but people like you feel sympathy for criminals and resent those who try to help others, without even realizing it.
 
These are some of the most unhinged comments I’ve ever seen.

A man stabbed two innocent people in an area prone to terrorist attacks (police officers are aware of this). He was tasered but kept holding the knife firmly, and there was no way to know what he might have had hidden on his body. In 99% of the countries in the world (even the ones you may view positively), that terrorist would have been shot dead.

Instead of praising the incredible work of these officers, who risked their own lives to save strangers, you two chose to attack them. And yes, don’t come with the nice talk claiming you didn’t attack them. By saying they should have treated the terrorist more gently, you are in fact attacking the entire police force that would have done exactly the same thing, because it was the right decision.

He had been tasered. What happens when people are electrocuted?”… “I don’t agree with kicking mentally ill people in the head”… Now get out of your fantasy bubble and watch a real world video:

... these comments can only come from someone who hates what is good and feels sympathy for what is bad. It’s like Stockholm syndrome embodied in a person

The need to feel sympathy for murderers (and would-be murderers) is so strong that you didn’t stop to consider that, in certain situations, electrocution is not enough to immobilize a person. Some people with high adrenaline levels, who have used CNS-stimulating drugs, or are experiencing a psychotic episode, may maintain full or partial control of their body even after being electrocuted. Even when struck by firearm bullets, some may remain in control for several seconds.

He fell after being shocked, but there’s no way for the officers to know how much control the criminal will have over his body. That’s why police must take additional actions beyond using a taser. If the suspect is still holding his weapon (a knife) after being electrocuted, officers MUST do whatever is necessary to take that knife from him in the safest way for themselves. And kicking proved to be an effective way to achieve that.

It’s incredibly easy to find videos and news stories of people who were electrocuted or even shot multiple times and still kept going. You wanted these officers to risk their own lives even more just to provide gentle treatment to someone who would have killed them if given the chance.

You can deny it, and you probably will, but people like you feel sympathy for criminals and resent those who try to help others, without even realizing it.

I mean, they're not unhinged at all. Whether you agree or disagree, which clearly you do, there is some room in this world still for nuanced debate. Whats happened here is exactly what you'ld expect on the internet though - a huge overreaction and hyperbole followed by a damning statement which completely distorts the original posters intent. Congrats. You're part of modern day society.
 
I mean, they're not unhinged at all. Whether you agree or disagree, which clearly you do, there is some room in this world still for nuanced debate. Whats happened here is exactly what you'ld expect on the internet though - a huge overreaction and hyperbole followed by a damning statement which completely distorts the original posters intent. Congrats. You're part of modern day society.
It’s more online society. People in real life are generally more relaxed and able to converse, but it is getting worse.

It’s almost as though debate on social media is now pointless. A conclusion I came to a while back that got ridiculed on here, but it’s interesting seeing more and more people come round to the same conclusion as time goes by.

Nuance and empathy online are dead.

The internet needs to return to being like this.



It’s better when it’s not serious.
 
You're probably right. The internet needs to return to this (this has nothing to do with what you were saying, but it came to mind so i wanted to post it!)

 
You're probably right. The internet needs to return to this (this has nothing to do with what you were saying, but it came to mind so i wanted to post it!)


I’d vote for a party that used this kind of thing as their Party Political Broadcasts rather than the shite they generally come up with.
 
He's a mentally ill guy who tried to kill 3 people. Race or religion shouldn't come into it until the motive is categorically known. It is now being used to have a go at the leader of the largest left-leaning party before the local elections. He should've said, "Fuck it, I stand by what I retweeted".
But context is everything.
He travelled to Golders Green, why, because he wanted to kill random people ?
How many more attacks on Jewish people are acceptable , according to AI In April 2026, the Jewish community in London was targeted in a coordinated campaign of ten attacks over a five-week period, including arson, firebombings, stabbings, and drone threats. That's in April.
This is getting very serious.
I saw a film once in 1938 Germany where Jews were hunted down in the streets and killed. Is it happening again?

We all hate what Netanyahu is doing but these people need serious help. Not excuses for their hatred.
 
But context is everything.
He travelled to Golders Green, why, because he wanted to kill random people ?
How many more attacks on Jewish people are acceptable , according to AI In April 2026, the Jewish community in London was targeted in a coordinated campaign of ten attacks over a five-week period, including arson, firebombings, stabbings, and drone threats. That's in April.
This is getting very serious.
I saw a film once in 1938 Germany where Jews were hunted down in the streets and killed. Is it happening again?

We all hate what Netanyahu is doing but these people need serious help. Not excuses for their hatred.
7 of those 10 are considered serious attacks too, as in people were either violently attacked or Jewish property was set fire to.

Jews in Britain have fuck all to do with what Netanyahu is doing and aren’t to blame. A significant number of people need to realise that.
 
7 of those 10 are considered serious attacks too, as in people were either violently attacked or Jewish property was set fire to.

Jews in Britain have fuck all to do with what Netanyahu is doing and aren’t to blame. A significant number of people need to realise that.
That's absolutely true especially the Orthodox Jews .... but I'd wager the one's suddenly coming out claiming that 'they're scared' and demand action from 'Harmer Starmer' are supporters of the genocidal lunatic in power in the Middle East.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top