Premier League Games | 9/10/11/13 May '26

That point hammers lost yesterday liekly send them down .

Spurs will lose vs Chelsea and get a point vs Everton , will west ham will lose vs toon and win their last game, going down on GD
 
Point tonight may be enough as they have a 11 better goal difference than West Ham.

Newcastle v West Ham
Chelsea v Spurs ( few days after Cup Final, like our game v Bournemouth, why both couldnt be a wednesday is baffling.

Then last game
Spurs v Everton
West Ham v Leeds
 
What is it with this forum and the belief things are rigged? 13 minutes added time is a deficit to spurs as a draw is alright. So surely 13 minutes means they could get fucked?

Also, who are spurs? Why would tge powers that be want them ok? It is the so called red cartel also including white?

It’s really odd.
 
LangleyBlue1970 said:
What is it with this forum and the belief things are rigged? 13 minutes added time is a deficit to spurs as a draw is alright. So surely 13 minutes means they could get fucked?

Also, who are spurs? Why would tge powers that be want them ok? It is the so called red cartel also including white?

It’s really odd.
Click to expand...
That twat levy
 
hertsblue said:
Point tonight may be enough as they have a 11 better goal difference than West Ham.

Newcastle v West Ham
Chelsea v Spurs ( few days after Cup Final, like our game v Bournemouth, why both couldnt be a wednesday is baffling.

Then last game
Spurs v Everton
West Ham v Leeds
Click to expand...
Leeds on the beach ?
 
Spurs playing equivalent of a 39th game - 16 added minutes in one half !

Timekeeping should be a priority not var.
 
LangleyBlue1970 said:
What is it with this forum and the belief things are rigged? 13 minutes added time is a deficit to spurs as a draw is alright. So surely 13 minutes means they could get fucked?

Also, who are spurs? Why would tge powers that be want them ok? It is the so called red cartel also including white?

It’s really odd.
Click to expand...
What is really odd, is that towards the end of the 13 additional minutes, the commentators know that there’s an additional minute on top!
 
youngbob said:
On what basis? They would have to prove that the decision was made through deliberate illegal malice, which it wasn't. Even if they didn't have to prove that - even if they only had to prove that the decision was made through incompetence - the fact that so many people do think it was a foul on Raya would also make it very hard to prove that PGMOL were alone in thinking it was a foul. So that would be a waste of everyone's time and a total non-starter.
Click to expand...
I wonder why they’ve put a complaint in and demanded an explanation?

Maybe you should get in touch and tell them it’s a non starter?
 
Stoned Rose said:
I wonder why they’ve put a complaint in and demanded an explanation?

Maybe you should get in touch and tell them it’s a non starter?
Click to expand...
There's a fucking chasm between asking for an explanation for a decision, which every team has done once or twice and is basically just asking for the minutes of the VAR review, and trying to prove in court that the decision to disallow the goal was arrived at maliciously by PGMOL in order to specifically defraud West Ham.
 
east2 said:
What is really odd, is that towards the end of the 13 additional minutes, the commentators know that there’s an additional minute on top!
Click to expand...
I’m sure Neville slipped up recently and said something along the lines of ‘we’re being told by the VAR’ and then backtracked and said they weren’t told anything and couldn’t listen to VAR
 
mike1923 said:
I’m sure Neville slipped up recently and said something along the lines of ‘we’re being told by the VAR’ and then backtracked and said they weren’t told anything and couldn’t listen to VAR
Click to expand...
They either get told by VAR or can hear the conversation, i think it's the latter.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top