And 'people like you' keep missing the point. I was specifically focusing on our performance - as distinct from our results - whereas you waffle on about specific incidents that only affected results, not performance.
I don't buy into the idea that seasoned internationals should need 100 games to grow accustomed to a league. You think that we're doing really well, whereas I feel that whilst we have a couple of players who have improved things, as a team we have not 'transitioned' particularly far from where we were before the Jan '25 window.
The dreary plodding forwards/sideways with the ball and players whose second nature is to stop during a break and wait for others to catch up - oblivious to the fact that the opposition defence has regrouped in the meantime - all this was still evident during the run-in. We created more likely situations in the final 5 minutes against Bournemouth than we had in the rest of the match. Did we just learn how to do this, at that moment? Of course not - we voluntarily approached the game the same way we were doing 18 months ago. How some have the cheek to complain about how little extra time was played defeats me, when we'd happily run the clock down all game - despite knowing that we had to win.
Two trophies are great, of course - but as I said they were effectively the result of winning five tough ties across both competitions. I think that just means that we wrung nearly everything out of the season, considering our standard of play.