Nicholas van Whatsisface
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 3,073
sure, all things are subject to the taste as well. But its just incorrect when you say "it may have been effective this year" or "its not an approach that's built for the long term".
It was effective last year as well and previous year too. UCL semi final and second in the Premier League is superb achievement and is super effective in my book.
Arsenal progressed pretty much every year for 5/6 years now. They had to change everything, basically all players bar Saka.
Your take that its not for a long term is a pure speculation and wishful thinking. You do not know and You cannot know. My bet is Arsenal is going nowhere unfortunately.
To be clear i have zero joy about arguing here in favour of Arteta or Arsenal, its just so contrfactual what You are writting that bothers me. Im a bit oversensitive about any kind of propaganda.
Ok - in my opinion, the approach of playing to set pieces and tactical fouls with limited emphasis on creating opportunities from open play cannot sustain in the long term, as referees will ultimately get wise to it.
Again - in my opinion - teams need to be capable of creating a number of genuine scoring opportunities from open play in every game to win in the long term.
PGMOL tweaks its approach ahead of every season to respond to changes in the game, and the tactics Arsenal deploy - which are to a large part reliant on referees, as they emphasise creating opportunities from set plays - are at greater risk of being legislated against next season, limiting their effectiveness.
Thats why I’m saying I don’t think it’s an approach that will sustain in the long term.
Thats my opinion, and I may be proven wrong - but there’s logic to why I hold it.
It’s not just wishful thinking, like you say.
Last edited: