You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR Discussion Thread
- Thread starter SebastianBlue
- Start date
100% they knew exactly what they were doing, it was basically a fuck you Pep and City. I bet they were pissing themselves laughing when they sent it to the stadium video screens and loved it when the crowd went berserk, all from the safety of 200 miles away. I bet they are texting the other gang members now with lots of funny emojis. Cunts.Piss taking bastards !
Not a chance, the refs know what is required and won’t give up this golden opportunity to manipulate results.Pre programmed AI will be next.
That might be a step up from its current statePre programmed AI will be next.
Well they haven’t even done that properly, if they were offside then they should be shaded black and they aren’t. If they rotated the image so that we were looking directly along the line of the last defender then it would be clear that he wasn’t offside, but because we are looking from an angle of about 30 degrees ahead of that line it looks as though hi is backside is ahead of his arm when it isn’t. Whether it is corrupt or incompetence it is totally amateur in its approach.Funniest thing is his cheeks are NOT offside. They've artificially extended his cheeks/shirt so that he ends up being offside. Look at the picture again, it's comical how unnatural it looks. I'm afraid this will continue unless we go to court with them.
I agree that we should be seeking some independent judgement on their performance, but I don’t know what avenues are open to us.
york away to this!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 11,180
Cheaty fucks
The real joke is that it isn’t even a still photo it’s a computer drawing and we all accept it! It could be anything! They could literally draw anything!Well they haven’t even done that properly, if they were offside then they should be shaded black and they aren’t. If they rotated the image so that we were looking directly along the line of the last defender then it would be clear that he wasn’t offside, but because we are looking from an angle of about 30 degrees ahead of that line it looks as though hi is backside is ahead of his arm when it isn’t. Whether it is corrupt or incompetence it is totally amateur in its approach.
I agree that we should be seeking some independent judgement on their performance, but I don’t know what avenues are open to us.
So was it the wrong image at the ground ? As the BBC said or was it’s just the black wasn’t clear enough to indicate he was offside ? Where did the wrong image come from ? Is his backside offside even tho it looks like he has had a butt implant and is not shaded to indicate offside ? Or is it his arm that’s offside which is shaded but which he cannot play the ball with so he isn’t offside.
None of it makes sense
None of it makes sense
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
If its for an arse offside then just as well Sterling isn`t playing anymore as his arse would have been offside on the half way line.So was it the wrong image at the ground ? As the BBC said or was it’s just the black wasn’t clear enough to indicate he was offside ? Where did the wrong image come from ? Is his backside offside even tho it looks like he has had a butt implant and is not shaded to indicate offside ? Or is it his arm that’s offside which is shaded but which he cannot play the ball with so he isn’t offside.
None of it makes sense
glauberbertistossedshirt
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2014
- Messages
- 278
The Premier League need to stop showing off-angle VAR replays. It's not a good look.
and here note the transistion at the beginning and the direct in-line confirmation at the end...
You think the off angle replays aren't intentional?
5cm toleranceYou think the off angle replays aren't intentional?
Bluekiwi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 4,340
- Location
- New Zealand (since 1974)
- Team supported
- Manchester City (from 1955) & Adelaide Crows (AFL)
Didn't the government introduce an independent person to oversee football issues?Well they haven’t even done that properly, if they were offside then they should be shaded black and they aren’t. If they rotated the image so that we were looking directly along the line of the last defender then it would be clear that he wasn’t offside, but because we are looking from an angle of about 30 degrees ahead of that line it looks as though hi is backside is ahead of his arm when it isn’t. Whether it is corrupt or incompetence it is totally amateur in its approach.
I agree that we should be seeking some independent judgement on their performance, but I don’t know what avenues are open to us.
Yes, to make sure it was a impartial appointment I think a certain Alex Fergiscum got the job :-)Didn't the government introduce an independent person to oversee football issues?
Bluekiwi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 4,340
- Location
- New Zealand (since 1974)
- Team supported
- Manchester City (from 1955) & Adelaide Crows (AFL)
Could clubs submit their complaints about VAR's incompetence (I mean corruption) to that person?Yes, to make sure it was a impartial appointment I think a certain Alex Fergiscum got the job :-)
Betterdeedthan red
Well-Known Member
Many already have had enough.Bent as fuck. Always has been and always will be. Couldn’t believe what I was seeing when that came on the big screen. Do away with it before fans decide they’ve had enough
Myself included .
Betterdeedthan red
Well-Known Member
The Premier League need to stop showing off-angle VAR replays. It's not a good look.
and here note the transistion at the beginning and the direct in-line confirmation at the end...
It's a farce.
Manipulation..when is the picture taken
city saint
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 6,862
I e said this all along why does it need a cartoon show us the still just another way to manipulateThe real joke is that it isn’t even a still photo it’s a computer drawing and we all accept it! It could be anything! They could literally draw anything!
Blue Feather
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 May 2013
- Messages
- 1,678
Yet another apology for an incorrect call incoming? Oh wait a minute, its us,,,,,
It’s not a surprise blue, they’re ruining the beautiful game. Taking the rush of emotion out of scoring a goal and replacing it with uncertainty and then normally confusion/anger inside the stadium. Never going to end well. All makes good TV and ‘content’ for Sky though doesn’t it…Many already have had enough.
Myself included .