Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,504
That might have legs, could live with that.Kinda sounds like a swap for Savinho.
That might have legs, could live with that.Kinda sounds like a swap for Savinho.
How do you mean we sold him to Viana?It was us who sold Porro to Viana and Viana who sold Porro to Spurs. Small world.
Meaning Viana bought Porro from us when at Sporting Lisbon.How do you mean we sold him to Viana?
if he sticks with his 3-2-4-1 then fullbacks won't be necessary as such but wing backs and Porro is a wing back by trade, Ait-Nueri would also. blossom in this systen tbf in theory
--------------------Goalkeeper-----------------
----Khush--------Guhei-------Gvardiol---
-------------Rodri-------Anderson-----------
-Porro------------------------------Ait-Nueri-
-------------Cherki------O'Rielly--------------
---------------------Big Earl--------------------
for example,
though I fully believe Nunes can do that role personally
I tend to. agree but I do feel O'Riellys full potential is wasted as just a fullback/LWB there is potentially the best attacking midfileder England has produced since Lampard waiting to be let looseNunes and O'Reilly seems like a ready made solution for Maresca, both can extend the field, can invert, very physical
I actually think his greatest potential is from left back. 2here he can ghost into great positions.I tend to. agree but I do feel O'Riellys full potential is wasted as just a fullback/LWB there is potentially the best attacking midfileder England has produced since Lampard waiting to be let loose
I think its the cost that folks don't likeWe literally do not have a right back at the club. I like Nunes there, so even if we count him that's 1. We need another one, so Porro looks like a solid option for rotation.
RightMeaning Viana bought Porro from us when at Sporting Lisbon.