Are people saying Arsenal controlled the game?
For the first hour or so PSG played all the football while Arsenal made it difficult for them. I acknowledge it became more end to end after that. Was tired and fell asleep at half time in extra time and only woke during penalties, so cannot comment on the second period of extra time there.
There seems to be this thing in football where if a team is playing all the football, but struggling to break down a low block, the low block team is claimed to 'control the game' just by breaking into space and scoring. I seen it too when rags went 2-0 up at the swamp v Liverpool even though the scousers were trying to play the football.
I think if you rely on sitting back and containing and launching transitions, you cannot really claim to 'control the game'. Obviously some possession can be sterile, as some of PSG's was, but that's still better than not having the ball at all. Like, fair play if you win while sitting back, but you can hardly claim you dominated the game or were the superior team.
That's why I have always liked watching Man City, Barca and Bayern (the latter against good teams rather than weaker teams in Bundesliga). They respect the ball, try to play football, play nice patterns with passes, have dribblers etc. These type of teams are what make football the beautiful game.