richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 34,074
We obviously have tapped him up
This is where I got it from:I think you are right. And for that reason, I am out!
Guess if they did this, Chelsea would have to pay the salaries of 2 managers ???This is a good point. Chelsea could say no to any offer City makes. Do we know how long his contract was at Chelsea and if there are any extra one-year extensions, Knowing Chelsea, they will not release details and what sort of power they hold on Enzo-Maresca
As I said, what are City playing at if this was known for months about the composition Chelsea would want
Pep's possible leaving was known for months by the club, even if he said it was later on when the reporter broke the news, City still should have had a plan in place ready to go.
What should have happened is that Enzo-Maresca and Pep worked together for that one-year extension and after 6 months Pep could have stepped down
It's for such culture that I come on here.This is where I got it from:
"To be is to do" Socrates
"To do is to be" Sartre
"Do be do be do" Sinatra
:)
Anyway, onto Maresca. Dafuq is he anyway? ;)
Oh ….its Mr Negative again. So you think he’s a tool? Well it takes one to THINK they know oneIf getting Maresca wasn’t already bad enough, we have to pay Chelsea for this tool.
Yet it turned out that I was right about the nature of the delay.Stop being a drama queen, you've only got the ramblings from a very bias media to go on, and they won't know much more than we do.
I'm sure Khaldoon knows what is going on, and is quite comfortable with it all, that's who matters.
Absolutely, old boy.It's for such culture that I come on here.
Depends. On how it was done.We obviously have tapped him up
The club obviously seem to think he is. If all the reports that we approached him all the way back at the end of last year are true. They would have known he had 3.5 years on his contract at that point, which would have been 3 years at this point.I want Him as I think He's a good natural progression but fuck me, what are we playing at, if we end up paying a lot of compo for Him, I think it's nuts. He's not the top top calibre of Manager that warrants that imo.
I did not mean to suggest that they were going to do so in this instance. I meant to describe the penalties for tapping up. Van Dijk was involved in a dispute which led to a delay in his transfer.Give over mate - the PL aren’t going to impose a point deduction or a transfer ban over this.
That outcome is in no-one’s interest, and any claim they might seek to pursue either of those measures is absurdly melodramatic at best.
If you have any examples of a precedent for a penalty of that magnitude, I’m all ears - but otherwise, you’re being disingenuous by even suggesting it.
This will be settled for a figure that both parties agree, and which will remain undisclosed - and Maresca will be announced once that process is complete.
And the point I was making was that this will have no material impact on his preparation for the job, or our planning for this summer - as both are able to proceed more or less as planned ahead of a formal confirmation.
We obviously have tapped him up
We have no idea what would have been in his mutual agreement to terminate his contract, or whether Chelsea have any basis to expect anything.Good luck with trying to get compensation, here's what the Chelsea club statement said:
"With key objectives still to play for across four competitions including qualification for Champions League football, Enzo and the club believe a change gives the team the best chance of getting the season back on track.
"We wish Enzo well for the future."
Did it ?Yet it turned out that I was right about the nature of the delay.
Ahh ffs, just seen what’s happened.The idiot told them we did. What was he playing at?!
It was apparently in his contract to disclose any approaches, according to reports. He would have been in breach of contract if he hadn't. Which would then risk getting himself ,erm, sacked. The irony.The idiot told them we did. What was he playing at?!
This is where I got it from:
"To be is to do" Socrates
"To do is to be" Sartre
"Do be do be do" Sinatra
: