Henry Nowak murder

He was a part of the Nihang sect of Sikh, which does have a tradition of carrying the larger blade. So yes it is a Sikh knife but isn’t exempt like the Kirpan.
The is a GBeebies video of all things saying it wasn’t a Kirpan and not Sikh and the intial reports last week said it was another knife not the Kurpan probably reports before they saying it was now they say Sikh knife. Tho I have read online that it was in-fact and Indo Pakistan knife and as you say not exempt either way
 
The is a GBeebies video of all things saying it wasn’t a Kirpan and not Sikh and the intial reports last week said it was another knife not the Kurpan probably reports before they saying it was now they say Sikh knife. Tho I have read online that it was in-fact and Indo Pakistan knife and as you say not exempt either way
Not an expert myself but from the trial.
But the CPS said Digwa chose to carry two ceremonial knives and that the judge's finding of fact made clear he agreed with its assessment that the weapon used was a kirpan.
For me it’s an irrelevance, he was stabbed by a scrote, whether that be a black, brown or white scrote is irrelevant. The point being questioned is the police response.
 
Last edited:
Correction Ric .
Everybody is allowed to carry a knife on their person when out and about in public places.
The law stipulates that it must be a folding knife,with a blade that is 3" long maximum.
And the blade must not lock when opened, so lock knives are strictly forbidden.
This allows for the fact that a knife is a tool( indeed prehistoric humans first tool were sharp pieces of flint).

Also whilst on the subject, the use of the 2 words " knife crime" is a huge misnomer.
A knife is an inanimate object, I've never heard about a knife or other type of blade jumping out of it's sheath and attacking someone.
The correct term for using a weapon to attack someone is VIOLENT CRIME, and these crimes are committed by VIOLENT CRIMINALS.
I have yet to hear or read about a knife or blades article being found guilty of murder or even manslaughter in a court of law, because as already stated it's an inanimate object with no mind of it's own.
Here endeth the lesson.
Whilst I totally agree with this post, I don’t seem to recall anything approaching this about the gun laws in the USA. Same point isn’t it?
 
Not an expert myself but from the trial.
But the CPS said Digwa chose to carry two ceremonial knives and that the judge's finding of fact made clear he agreed with its assessment that the weapon used was a kirpan.
For me it’s an irrelevance, he was stabbed by a scrote, whether that be a black, brown or white scrote is irrelevant. The point being questioned is the police response.
 
Whilst I totally agree with this post, I don’t seem to recall anything approaching this about the gun laws in the USA. Same point isn’t it?
What have gun laws in the USA ( very complex laws as each individual state has it's own laws on owning and carrying firearms) got to do with a law that allows people in the UK to carry a small folding non lockable knife.
Your post doesn't make any sense at all.
 
What have gun laws in the USA ( very complex laws as each individual state has it's own laws on owning and carrying firearms) got to do with a law that allows people in the UK to carry a small folding non lockable knife.
Your post doesn't make any sense at all.
Oh dear, the analogy is the carrying of deadly weapons
 
Interestingly you quote actual invasions and the most recent one of those invasions being a thousands years ago, that ship probably stayed afloat for the past thousand years considering we aren't being invaded.
Fair enough. And I've always admired old King Harold and even older Boudicca as heroes for lost causes, while accepting they were on the wrong side of history. I just hope the modern "take it elsewhere" folk (Farage, etc.) are too, nowt heroic about them.
 
What have gun laws in the USA ( very complex laws as each individual state has it's own laws on owning and carrying firearms) got to do with a law that allows people in the UK to carry a small folding non lockable knife.
Your post doesn't make any sense at all.
Neither does someone who uses it's when they mean its, in every post.
 
100% right re. same laws for all and equal justice under them. Thank you to Magna Carta, the Enlightenment, Tom Paine, Emily Pankhurst, etc.

But "take your culture elsewhere"? Nasty stuff, that. And apart from its nastiness, it doesn't work. Going back a bit the Celts would have said "take your culture elsewhere" to the Romans, as would Saxons to Normans and so on through 2,000 years of Britain's story. And what emerged from that mix of languages, laws, religions and customs was not a monocultural people. Arguably never has been. "Take it elsewhere" isn't just a ship that's sailed, it's sunk.

Nasty stuff is plunging a ceremonial knife repeatedly into an 18 year old kid, the rest I couldn’t give a fuck about
 
That’s a lot of crap to read before my first coffee.

‘Apply laws evenly and without prejudice’ Do you realise applying laws evenly results in prejudice?
Two tier? No evidence of that in policing-it’s another right wing slogan designed to whip up the ignorant. In fact it was more two tier when police forces were found to be institutionally racist-the far right grifters are desperately trying to undo years of work as part of their culture wars.

Wasn’t the knife Digwa used illegal anyhow?

Clueless and deluded
 
Nasty stuff is plunging a ceremonial knife repeatedly into an 18 year old kid, the rest I couldn’t give a fuck about
Only this, the fucking nonsense people speak about, a kid is dead, his last moments were handcuffed scared with his murderer stood watching, the police were a shambles. That is it. End of story.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top