mancity dan
Well-Known Member
Not fishing. Just a bitter of **** I think.
I thought he was more of a shandy drinker? ;-)
Not fishing. Just a bitter of **** I think.
Nothing that you just wrote is along the lines of it seeming City are just one part of the CFG though is it?It was a load of fluff, cotton wool, statement of the bleedin' obvious, saying what he thought we wanted to hear, whatever you want to call it. Beautifully done but no insight or anything remotely challenging. It was instantly forgettable, unlike the others he's done. That's fine if you like that sort of thing but just accept some of us like a bit more substance over style. And cut out the abuse please.
Nope, playing fine.Is part 2 not playing for anyone else?.... It's not loading up this morning for me on OS
We flogged a dead horse trying to spread that over two days.
The second part is not something I need or want to hear at this present time, regardless of the brilliance of the business concept.
Time to be focused again on the one and only City.
Mr Chairman hit all the right notes in the first interview and should have left it there.
Like I said, yesterday, I felt an twinge of embarrassment for Khaldoon, having to sit there and defend highly-paid people who have let him and Sheikh Mansour down.
i love you man.He'll say he realises he was completely wrong about muffins and that they are definitely barms.
I've just realised what the long section praising James Milner was about. It was Khaldoon sending a message to Raheem Sterling that we are not a club who acts peevishly and immaturely over players deciding to move on. Clever move.
that was my thinking to and they way he talked about Lampard.. it's a message to all players who city are interested in now and in the future..
We flogged a dead horse trying to spread that over two days.
The second part is not something I need or want to hear at this present time, regardless of the brilliance of the business concept.
Time to be focused again on the one and only City.
Mr Chairman hit all the right notes in the first interview and should have left it there.
Like I said, yesterday, I felt an twinge of embarrassment for Khaldoon, having to sit there and defend highly-paid people who have let him and Sheikh Mansour down.
foul mouthed parasite thug trying to look smart lolNot fishing. Just a bitter of **** I think.
I don't know, I read it as more of an attempt at reinforcing for the fans what kind of player culture he wants City to have. I find it highly dubious that Raheem Sterling or any other player (or agent) would even know that these interviews exist, let alone actually watch them and then realise that part of it might be a veiled message aimed at them. Heck, I doubt most of our current squad have even watched it. The sad thing is that players do not act like fans - they don't eagerly drink in any media the club puts out.that was my thinking to and they way he talked about Lampard.. it's a message to all players who city are interested in now and in the future..
well today there is maybe 10,000 under 16s footballers affiliated to the group ,see any benefits in that? not to mention partnerships such as citi bank ,Until I see what CFG does directly for us then I don't see why I should care. That second part of the interview was all information I didn't really care to hear.
Regardless, the first part hit all the right notes for me. I genuinely look forward to this interview every year.
It was a load of fluff, cotton wool, statement of the bleedin' obvious, saying what he thought we wanted to hear, whatever you want to call it. Beautifully done but no insight or anything remotely challenging. It was instantly forgettable, unlike the others he's done. That's fine if you like that sort of thing but just accept some of us like a bit more substance over style. And cut out the abuse please.