Raheem Sterling - Done - See main forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
aa123 said:
In terms of the deal, youve given us Milner in his prime + £49million for Raheem Sterling.

I think we can agree Milner played better than Sterling last year as well.
Click to expand...

 
I'd pay 25-30 million for him maximum. As I said before I'd rather have both Isco+pedro because at least they would understand pellegrini's system and ideas. We could then have bought green or butland for the home grown quota
 
colombia-mcfc said:
I'd pay 25-30 million for him maximum. As I said before I'd rather have both Isco+pedro because at least they would understand pellegrini's system and ideas. We could then have bought green or butland for the home grown quota
Click to expand...
ISCO IS NOT AVAILABLE or otherwise there would be fucking queue of clubs after him. Fucks sake this is not football manager.
 
colombia-mcfc said:
I'd pay 25-30 million for him maximum. As I said before I'd rather have both Isco+pedro because at least they would understand pellegrini's system and ideas. We could then have bought green or butland for the home grown quota
Click to expand...

You melt!!!!!!

Isco would of been over 40 million so don't see your point
 
aa123 said:
In terms of the deal, youve given us Milner in his prime + £49million for Raheem Sterling.
Click to expand...
No we haven't, Milner saw his contract out with us (you know like Sterling didn't), we had Milner at his prime (unlike you), and when will you lot actually work out that you're NOT getting £49m because 20% goes to QPR.

Oh and you still have Rodgers in charge, enjoy.
 
aa123. It's all relative isn't it? £49 million to most people is a lot of money. But to the Sheikh, he drops that much in loose change running for the bus.
These Liverpool fans trying to kid themselves is laughable.
I bet they're stood there like little kids, hands in their pockets, staring at the floor, moving one ankle side to side muttering, "didn't want him anyway "
 
aa123 said:
In terms of the deal, youve given us Milner in his prime + £49million for Raheem Sterling.

I think we can agree Milner played better than Sterling last year as well.
Click to expand...
Well, I guess you guys win then. Great deal for you. But somehow I am not angry. So can we say win win situation and call it even?
 
aa123 said:
In terms of the deal, youve given us Milner in his prime + £49million for Raheem Sterling.

I think we can agree Milner played better than Sterling last year as well.
Click to expand...

Milner is a shit CM and it's doubtful he'll play as well with your mediocre players
 
I fear that we have another Shaun Wright-Phillips here. The problem with buying him for this pricee is that if he is a flop then we would make a huge loss.
 
Excellent news. ... looking forward to the lad tying defences in knots next year before passing to someone who knows how to score. We might just teach him how to do that as well but you can only expect so much for £44M + tips.
Let's all stop celebrating for a moment though and hold a minutes silence. .. maybe light a candle of you will... in memory of Liverpool.. They used to be a big club and. ....
Sorry no. .. can't keep it up. ..
Have it you hub cap stealing fookers !!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top