Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
Any negativity written in the press will only get worse.

Their City demographic will get smaller for being marginalised and their rag demographic will be pandered to even more as they make up an ever increasing market share.
 
Any negativity written in the press will only get worse.

Their City demographic will get smaller for being marginalised and their rag demographic will be pandered to even more as they make up an ever increasing market share.
Sound like sommat the Judaen peoples front would say.. ;)
 
If by some miracle we finished the season unbeaten and won every cup including dicking Barca 6-0 in the CL final these fuckers would still put a negative slant on it.
 
I guess the question is:

Do you believe anything you read in the media?

If not, then why do you give a toss about anything the media says about City?

Ask those two questions to any fan of another club. It soon shuts up any negative discussion you're having with them in regards to City.
 
Whilst perusing a few sites on the premiership sides new kits , every club gets praised or slated on their designs ie (terrible/great design ect) we get this

Manchester City home
Here's how it goes for Man City. One year - win the league. The next - be boring and disappointing in a way that defies the billions of pounds spent year after year on incredible footballers, and sends rich men home crying and for a cuddle with their faithful and understanding oil reserves. The league-winning years have both come when City have had a white trim on their sky blue, rather than the marginally classier but SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN TO BE LESS EFFECTIVE darker blue.

The Telegraph is a constant stream of anti-City propaganda these days. Stuff them, I won't be clicking on it any more.
 
The Gutterpress is one big Burger, and blues are still taking a big bite out of the bait.

You are still visiting their webshites, still listening to talkshite, still subscribing to SlySports...

I've fucked them cunts off years ago and don't engage with their nonsense.

Who gives a fuck what their opinions are?
YOU do...

City as a club welcome these cunts to the stadium with lavish meals, hospitality leather seats, we literally give them everything we the loyal fans don't get.
We have to pay for that shit.

Fuck them, and if you're still affected get these cunts pictures and let's find out where they live.

yep, it makes my piss boil but sadly City associate themselves with the press so lavishly, as you say, bcos one day when we have titles and CLs under our belts, the media will love us, bcos half the country will support us, and City will have always treated them well.

it's a big shit game and City know it.
 
Whilst perusing a few sites on the premiership sides new kits , every club gets praised or slated on their designs ie (terrible/great design ect) we get this

Manchester City home
Here's how it goes for Man City. One year - win the league. The next - be boring and disappointing in a way that defies the billions of pounds spent year after year on incredible footballers, and sends rich men home crying and for a cuddle with their faithful and understanding oil reserves. The league-winning years have both come when City have had a white trim on their sky blue, rather than the marginally classier but SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN TO BE LESS EFFECTIVE darker blue.
So the Telegraph are tipping us for the title? What agenda? It's been SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN! How our man at the DT will laugh.
 
If by some miracle we finished the season unbeaten and won every cup including dicking Barca 6-0 in the CL final these fuckers would still put a negative slant on it.

of course they would - they'd say 'well done' through gritted teeth and then say it was 'bought' in the end - then they'd concentrate on how the other 'big' teams could improve and beat city all the while giving out shitty platitudes to appease the mindless majority of rags, dippers etc
 
of course they would - they'd say 'well done' through gritted teeth and then say it was 'bought' in the end - then they'd concentrate on how the other 'big' teams could improve and beat city all the while giving out shitty platitudes to appease the mindless majority of rags, dippers etc

And Pellegrini would still not make manager of the year.
 
of course they would - they'd say 'well done' through gritted teeth and then say it was 'bought' in the end - then they'd concentrate on how the other 'big' teams could improve and beat city all the while giving out shitty platitudes to appease the mindless majority of rags, dippers etc

We never 'win' anything others always lose it.
 
So May 2016

Top 4
1st City
2nd Arsenal
3rd Chelsea
4th Rags

Headlines along the lines of

It's Gunner be close - Arsenal nearly win first title in 11 years
Pep talk - City title turmoil as Pep meets Txixi
Is Depay better than Ronaldo?

FA cup winners - Chelsea beat Liverpool 1-0
League Cup - Rags beat Bolton 4-0

Manger of the year - Van Gaal for bringing back the glory to The theatre of (wet) dreams
Player of the year - Edin Hazard (votes cast in August 2015)
Young player - Depay (votes cast after he bamboozles Bolton at Wembley with an assist & a deflected free kick goal)

Media pundits team of the year
Czech
Darmian
Azpilacueta
Terry
Koscielny
Milner
Coutinho
Depay
Schweinsteiger
Kane
Firmino

Anyone want the lottery numbers?
 
They'd never keep a clean sheet against Bolton......

Spurs for one of the cups the other domestic one will be ours, all depends on who we get in the LC semi and how the CL games fall as to which cup we blow.
Fair point - Headline - Goals Gaalore - Un***d demolish Bolton 4-3 (failing to mention Bolton keeper sent off 2nd minute & 3 rag goals clearly offside)
 
Alan Brazil's main questions this morning were: "Who do you think are favourites for the league this year, Chelsea?" and also "United have made good signings this year, do you think they'll finish above City?" Nice to hear such open, non-leading questions from top notch broadcasters!

Apparently Rio believes that John Stones would be an absolute idiot if he chose Chelsea over United too. He is obviously thinking of the amazing development that Johnny Evans and Phil Jones have gone through.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top