Smoking

Mate they are worse than a ****
A fellow blue wanting other blues banned as thats what would happen

I dont give a fuck if its right or wrong that they are smoking in the bogs but to bubble them is fuckin low, only a fuckin horrible twat would do that.

So I can knock you out next game and you won't grass me up? Or what about steal your wallet...hmmm...it's alright, I'll get away with it as you won't grass me up cos I'm a Blue.
 
Mate they are worse than a ****
A fellow blue wanting other blues banned as thats what would happen

I dont give a fuck if its right or wrong that they are smoking in the bogs but to bubble them is fuckin low, only a fuckin horrible twat would do that.
Ridiculous comment. The "horrible twats" are the ones making a visit to the toilet a deeply unpleasant experience for others, by actually breaking the law of the land with their selfish actions. As has already been mentioned, if those smokers had to go on a 3 or 4 hour flight to their holidays, they'd happily go without a fag for that time. Yet they're unwilling to go a couple of hours fag fre on a saturday afternoon?
 
Ridiculous comment. The "horrible twats" are the ones making a visit to the toilet a deeply unpleasant experience for others, by actually breaking the law of the land with their selfish actions. As has already been mentioned, if those smokers had to go on a 3 or 4 hour flight to their holidays, they'd happily go without a fag for that time. Yet they're unwilling to go a couple of hours fag fre on a saturday afternoon?

Stop preaching :)

People have addictions and we have to be sensitive.
 
I'm a smoker, anywhere up to around 20 a day but even I can go without one for the couple of hours I'm in the ground for.
 
Stop preaching :)

People have addictions and we have to be sensitive.
Good comeback, actually! But if we're talking about being sensitive, what about smokers being sensitive to the discomfort their actions cause to others? Is a couple of hours without a fag that much to ask? Not having a pop at you personally here, by the way.
 
So I can knock you out next game and you won't grass me up? Or what about steal your wallet...hmmm...it's alright, I'll get away with it as you won't grass me up cos I'm a Blue.
So knocking someone out is similar to someone having a crafty fag?
Ffs make a decent comparison.
 
Ridiculous comment. The "horrible twats" are the ones making a visit to the toilet a deeply unpleasant experience for others, by actually breaking the law of the land with their selfish actions. As has already been mentioned, if those smokers had to go on a 3 or 4 hour flight to their holidays, they'd happily go without a fag for that time. Yet they're unwilling to go a couple of hours fag fre on a saturday afternoon?
I'll ask you the same question
Would you get fellow blues stadium bans for having a crafty fag?
 
Smoking Genuinely is one of the most stupid things a human could do. Here's planet Earth, where oxygen is needed to survive and also where many geniuses restrict the intake of oxygen through smoking a stick of chemicals. Ok I get it, it's what the cool kids did, so was wanking but at least those guys keep it to themselves ( most of them )
 
Just do what I and most others near me do and use the toilets near 107, never seen anyone smoking in there.

Maybe City should designate the bogs near K1 entrance as "The Fogs"
And throw all the smokers in there.

I also have a mooch further down the concourse and use the other toilets as they are a tad cleaner.
 
I'll ask you the same question
Would you get fellow blues stadium bans for having a crafty fag?
They'd be getting themselves banned by
A. Ignoring the discomfort of others
B. Ignoring the rules laid out by the club. And, more important than either of those two
C. Breaking the law of the land.

If they didn't smoke, they wouldn't get reported and, consequently, wouldn't get banned. It's not rocket science.
 
They'd be getting themselves banned by
A. Ignoring the discomfort of others
B. Ignoring the rules laid out by the club. And, more important than either of those two
C. Breaking the law of the land.

If they didn't smoke, they wouldn't get reported and, consequently, wouldn't get banned. It's not rocket science.

We have a winner.
 
Im saying i wouldnt report fellow blues as they would get stadium bans

Would you?
Im saying i wouldnt report fellow blues as they would get stadium bans

Would you?
lets turn it around I have a legal right to spend my recreation time in a smoke free environment so what am I to do if my rights are being denied me? I have not reported anyone for smoking by the way but you seem to think it's ok for others to inflict their habit on me because they are blues
 
Good comeback, actually! But if we're talking about being sensitive, what about smokers being sensitive to the discomfort their actions cause to others? Is a couple of hours without a fag that much to ask? Not having a pop at you personally here, by the way.

I'd love to argue :) but I agree too much. Some duplicity is at hand here though.. Oh yes. :)
 
They'd be getting themselves banned by
A. Ignoring the discomfort of others
B. Ignoring the rules laid out by the club. And, more important than either of those two
C. Breaking the law of the land.

If they didn't smoke, they wouldn't get reported and, consequently, wouldn't get banned. It's not rocket science.
I'll ask again would you get fellow blues stadium bans for smoking
Yes or no?

Ive already said i dont smoke and i cant stand it but i couldnt give two fucks if once a fortnight for less than minute i walk past a few smokers

My whole argument on here is folk wanting to get blues banned, not if its right or wrong.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top