Locked threads

Status
Not open for further replies.
poh said:
[QU



I like reading BM but have noticed over the years more posts and threads disappearing.

One lad got perma banned for saying 'he sometimes finds Jewish people a bit odd' yet a moderator said 'Muslims should be locked in a mosque and burnt to death'... I think it was Prestwichblue.

I do believe moderators are allowing their own faith cloud their moderating. Which for the most liberally moderated football forum is wrong.

My option feel free to disagree.
Click to expand...

I don't need to disagree, because I actually read the Mod Forum and know what those posts said, and what you have done is completely take them out of context and essentially make up a reasoning which is total bollocks.

This is why I don't need to disagree because you're wrong. We don't disagree on what 3 and 3 is, no matter how much some people have told you it's 628. It's still 3.

And faith based moderating is one of the dumbest accusations I've ever heard. I'm an anti-religious atheist, others are atheist or agnostic. Some are Jewish and I don't even think they're practicing Jews. Several are Christians. The owner is married to a Catholic. All decisions are team decisions which we debate and decide what to do on as a collective unit. I had a decision overturned about 5 minutes ago because others felt it was the wrong one; this happens every day somewhere on the team.

The idea that we would allow such a thing is ridiculous
 
Damocles said:
Bluemoon is, by a massive massive distance, the least moderated major football forum in the entire world.

Your opinion is absolutely wrong.
Click to expand...

I concur. If you are a blue and manage to get banned from here you should look in the dictionary for the definition of the word '****'
 
stony said:
I concur. If you are a blue and manage to get banned from here you should look in the dictionary for the definition of the word '****'
Click to expand...
I got banned a couple of weeks ago - you might be onto something there.
 
johnny on the spot said:
'I don't have to disagree, for I am omniscient'.

Outstanding.
Click to expand...

"I don't have to disagree because whilst somebody else might have an opinion on what someone wrote, I have the ability to actually look at what somebody wrote so don't need to rely on guesses"
 
Pablo1 said:
I got banned a couple of weeks ago - you might be onto something there.
Click to expand...

Please don't think I'm trying to say you aren't a ****, but I meant permabanned. Temp bans are part and parcel of being a member on bluemoon, everyone gets pissed and feels the need to vent every now and then.
 
stony said:
Please don't think I'm trying to say you aren't a ****, but I meant permabanned. Temp bans are part and parcel of being a member on bluemoon, everyone gets pissed and feels the need to vent every now and then.
Click to expand...
Haha! Well as long as I'm still a ****.
 
[QUOTEdog's Damocles
Damocles said:
I don't need to disagree, because I actually read the Mod Forum and know what those posts said, and what you have done is completely take them out of context and essentially make up a reasoning which is total bollocks.

This is why I don't need to disagree because you're wrong. We don't disagree on what 3 and 3 is, no matter how much some people have told you it's 628. It's still 3.

And faith based moderating is one of the dumbest accusations I've ever heard. I'm an anti-religious atheist, others are atheist or agnostic. Some are Jewish and I don't even think they're practicing Jews. Several are Christians. The owner is married to a Catholic. All decisions are team decisions which we debate and decide what to do on as a collective unit. I had a decision overturned about 5 minutes ago because others felt it was the wrong one; this happens every day somewhere on the team.

The idea that we would allow such a thing is ridiculous
Click to expand...

mocles, post: 9139485, member: 1"]I don't need to disagree, because I actually read the Mod Forum and know what those posts said, and what you have done is completely take them out of context and essentially make up a reasoning which is total bollocks.

This is why I don't need to disagree because you're wrong. We don't disagree on what 3 and 3 is, no matter how much some people have told you it's 628. It's still 3.

And faith based moderating is one of the dumbest accusations I've ever heard. I'm an anti-religious atheist, others are atheist or agnostic. Some are Jewish and I don't even think they're practicing Jews. Several are Christians. The owner is married to a Catholic. All decisions are team decisions which we debate and decide what to do on as a collective unit. I had a decision overturned about 5 minutes ago because others felt it was the wrong one; this happens every day somewhere on the team.

The idea that we would allow such a thing is ridiculous[/QUOTE]

Fair do's
Damocles said:
"I don't have to disagree because whilst somebody else might have an opinion on what someone wrote, I have the ability to actually look at what somebody wrote so don't need to rely on guesses"
Click to expand...

Fair enough Damocles. You have access to the mod room so what joke or humour would permit a mod to think burning people of Islam to death be funny? Is there any chance you could possibly explain or even remind us of the contents of that thread..... maybe it was 'just a joke'.
 
poh said:
Fair enough Damocles. You have access to the mod room so what joke or humour would permit a mod to think burning people of Islam to death be funny? Is there any chance you could possibly explain or even remind us of the contents of that thread..... maybe it was 'just a joke'.
Click to expand...

Yes I could.

What an interesting line of questioning this has become. An incredibly familiar one too. I'm sure Ric has any answers you want.
 
Damocles said:
No. I know that you've recently had a kid because I had one at the exact same time and we traded scan pictures on a thread here you mad bastard
Click to expand...

Reported you to yourself anyway, chum. So in the immortal words of Anita Ward, you can ring my bell. Ring my bell.

Her name is Matilda. And she is ace. How's yours?
 
johnny on the spot said:
Reported you to yourself anyway, chum. So in the immortal words of Anita Ward, you can ring my bell. Ring my bell.

Her name is Matilda. And she is ace. How's yours?
Click to expand...

I disagree, I think it's Donald.

Yeah he's good. I gave him Sergio as a middle name and he's got City kit babygrows, so the indoctrination has started earlier.
 
Let's not turn this into the SAHD's fucking rainbow sure start centre swimming session. These lads behind me have legit gripes about their internet lives. Glad it's going okay. We've been given City kits, but I'd rather not clamour to squeeze my child into sweatshop tat or cover her in corporate logos for unethical, unenvironmental companies who prop up the lavish capitalist lifestyles of their idealised puppets.
 
johnny on the spot said:
Just kidding. Either that or she'll follow her mother's tossers and support fucking Newcastle.
Click to expand...

The indoctrination of an offspring cannot be started soon enough. I lost ground on No1 son on account of being in a mixed marriage, she is rabidly rag, as are her parents. We agreed that he could make his own mind up when he was old enough only for me to come home from work to pick him up from his rag grandparents and he was wearing a rag shirt. The fall out from that has been told many times on here, but the moral of that story is don't believe a fucking word they say and brainwash the little fucker while you've got the chance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top