Paul Hayward

I think it may be something in the DNA or water in that part of the world. This is a conversation I had with a dipper today.

Scouse----50 million thank you very much



Me---- I really don't understand why Liverpool supporters are obsessed with the money we paid for Stirling. Get over it, as it's not bothering us, spend it wisely? I also can't understand why they continue to boo the lad. Kolo Toure came on for Liverpool and the City end applauded him and sang the Toure song, now that's class.



Scouse----Different situations on how they left that's why


Me-----I think your answer should be is in the way the whole situation was handled between your club/Rodgers and the media. I think if anyone feels that they may have better prospects at some other employment then they are entitled to change surely? The money is irrelevant as that is the big stick you use to hit back with as that seems to be issue in your first post. Like I said enjoy it.


Scouse----- Should be able to get a few good players hopefully for that amount thanks, isn't it funny how different fans hear different stories?


Me------That's the media for you as none of us will really know exactly how it was played out, only those parties connected. Oh and don't thank me as i didn't pay it, besides knowing the way football is today, he has possibly paid for himself and already has a medal in his closet.
 
bluelol said:
I think it may be something in the DNA or water in that part of the world. This is a conversation I had with a dipper today.

Scouse----50 million thank you very much



Me---- I really don't understand why Liverpool supporters are obsessed with the money we paid for Stirling. Get over it, as it's not bothering us, spend it wisely? I also can't understand why they continue to boo the lad. Kolo Toure came on for Liverpool and the City end applauded him and sang the Toure song, now that's class.



Scouse----Different situations on how they left that's why


Me-----I think your answer should be is in the way the whole situation was handled between your club/Rodgers and the media. I think if anyone feels that they may have better prospects at some other employment then they are entitled to change surely? The money is irrelevant as that is the big stick you use to hit back with as that seems to be issue in your first post. Like I said enjoy it.


Scouse----- Should be able to get a few good players hopefully for that amount thanks, isn't it funny how different fans hear different stories?


Me------That's the media for you as none of us will really know exactly how it was played out, only those parties connected. Oh and don't thank me as i didn't pay it, besides knowing the way football is today, he has possibly paid for himself and already has a medal in his closet.
Click to expand...


Remind him they only got £35m after QPR took their cut, and they spent £32.5m of it on Christian Benteke.
 
domalino said:
Remind him they only got £35m after QPR took their cut, and they spent £32.5m of it on Christian Benteke.
Click to expand...
Don't forget that, as Stirling didn't put in a transfer request, he is also entitled to 10% of the fee. That means that the net figure they received was less than what they paid for Benteke. Good business, eh, considering which player has received a winner's medal over the weekend.
 
No doubt Hayward made the same comments about Cleverley , Macheda and Jizzeye , this Ramshite kid will be loaned out to Steve Bruce , Mark Hughes or some other ex rag manager , and will eventually end up like Welbeck , a bit part player at a club like the goons , they have not brought through a decent player at their academy since 1992 , but like most modern day journalists , why let the truth get in the way of a good story.
 
crazyg said:
Don't forget that, as Stirling didn't put in a transfer request, he is also entitled to 10% of the fee. That means that the net figure they received was less than what they paid for Benteke. Good business, eh, considering which player has received a winner's medal over the weekend.
Click to expand...

Hahahaha oh that's too funny. So Raheem walked off with £4.4m, QPR took their 8.8m and Liverpool walked away with £30.8 - £1.7m less than they paid for a bench warmer.
 
jimmygrimblesboots said:
No doubt Hayward made the same comments about Cleverley , Macheda and Jizzeye , this Ramshite kid will be loaned out to Steve Bruce , Mark Hughes or some other ex rag manager , and will eventually end up like Welbeck , a bit part player at a club like the goons , they have not brought through a decent player at their academy since 1992 , but like most modern day journalists , why let the truth get in the way of a good story.
Click to expand...

He reminds me a lot of Jermaine Beckford who played for Leeds & numerous other Championship clubs & I reckon that's where he will eventually end up.
 
I hope in years to come with our continued success that we don't have City supporting journalists who act like the complete cunts like we have to put up with now.

Too many who act like mardarse fans down the pub rather than journalists.
 
His only saving grace is that he tweeted during the Tottenham game predicting that Kelechi will be better than Martial.

But yeah, no excuse for that kind of shit, completely endorses the media rag bias
 
If he wanted to make a point about the availability of talent other than paying the cost of a current young English international why didn't he say so?

Probably because it makes no fucking sense at all to compare the price of a wet nosed kid to the latter!
Let's see where he is if he gets chance to play the next 3 seasons in the PL, starting week In week out. Which unfortunately he won't as when 300k a week big ears is fit again he won't even make the bench.
 
Jordan CTID said:
His only saving grace is that he tweeted during the Tottenham game predicting that Kelechi will be better than Martial.

But yeah, no excuse for that kind of shit, completely endorses the media rag bias
Click to expand...

He's just trying to up his profile, Twitter has a lot to answer for in promoting knobheads. I've never heard of him before and could not care if I ever do again. He seems a bitter twat.
 
That face on his Twitter profile! Haha! He looks like he's just been given some particular bad news off his doctor the glum looking ****.
 
Kinkys Left Foot said:
Let's see where he is if he gets chance to play the next 3 seasons in the PL, starting week In week out. Which unfortunately he won't as when 300k a week big ears is fit again he won't even make the bench.
Click to expand...

You misunderstand; this will be judged as superb man management by taking a young kid out of the limelight and firing line.
Nothing said about it being a total fluke that Rashford played the last two games just because the £50m man was injured.
The irony being that Hayward slates Raheem and his pricetag, yet doesn't mention the cost of the man that Rashford replaced.

All hail King Louey
 
Hayward was a dick last year, a dick last month a dick last week, a dick on Sunday and Monday and is a dick today. In short he is a dick.
Definately a raggy even though he 'claims' to be a Brighton fan. Wrote Bodily head's autobiography and fawns over the red white at every opportunity.
Hates what we have done to his boys.
Just a digital media dick. Sadly every paper has at least two. The Telegraph has about 6 even with Mark Ogden's exit. The football section is just a rag fanzine with Liverpool, Arse and Chelski sub sections. Will go bust eventually as all purveyors of digital mediah eventually will as the fans of other clubs (or minorities not pandered too elsewhere in the paper) don't bother anymore.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top