Nasri is a better option than Silva as a wide player and De Bruyne is a better option than Silva as a number 10. Just my opinion.
Nasri is a better option than Silva as a wide player and De Bruyne is a better option than Silva as a number 10. Just my opinion.
Why? I'd rather have Nasri than SterlingOn current form, yes.
Still, Nasri shouldn't be anywhere near the wing when we have a fully healthy squad.
On current form, yes.
Still, Nasri shouldn't be anywhere near the wing when we have a fully healthy squad.
So Nasri is the latest shit player we have according to a small few on here is he?
Absolute codswallop.
One of the best we have more like.
Why? I'd rather have Nasri than Sterling
yep, i`m sometimes gobsmack by some so called football fans
You're placing too much importance on starting positions, rigid formations on paper etc. He didn't look to be getting chalk on his boots to me when he was expertly sliding Aguero in for his 2nd, or when Nasri was arriving into the box for his one-on-one. Or when he was probing with Yaya outside the box. He has to retreat to the left when we lose the ball, but the second we win it he has the freedom to go wherever the space is, leaving the left wing to Kolarov. Nasri on the left turns our 2 man midfield into a 3 man midfield, which is very useful.He's just 100% more effective in the middle. Even if you prefer Nasri to Sterling, Raheem has the pace to break with speed and prevent opposition full backs from getting forward. Whereas Nasri is the kind of player who can dictate the tempo of games when started centrally.
He was a far better player when he played in the middle at Arsenal. Samir's been fantastic in spells for us but I just wish he'd get a run of games away from wide positions.
You're placing too much importance on starting positions, rigid formations on paper etc. He didn't look to be getting chalk on his boots to me when he was expertly sliding Aguero in for his 2nd, or when Nasri was arriving into the box for his one-on-one. Or when he was probing with Yaya outside the box. He has to retreat to the left when we lose the ball, but the second we win it he has the freedom to go wherever the space is, leaving the left wing to Kolarov. Nasri on the left turns our 2 man midfield into a 3 man midfield, which is very useful.
Imagine we'll find out the full extent of his injury today, really hope it's nothing serious, he's been excellent since he's come back.
Only a small minority of us on here who know what we're talking about, mate. Nasri is going to be superb next season. Makes me laugh when I see people slag him off, probably the same who chant "ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK" at totally inappropriate parts of the game.So Nasri is the latest shit player we have according to a small few on here is he?
Absolute codswallop.
One of the best we have more like.
you can pretend all you like, but he will never be a top player..............lack of character. He will always be a nearly man.
![]()
What's with this rewriting of history? He's always been a quality player, the problem has always been his inconsistency. Funnily enough that's what people get pissed off about, knowing he's got the ability in spades but failing to take it into games.Only a small minority of us on here who know what we're talking about, mate. Nasri is going to be superb next season. Makes me laugh when I see people slag him off, probably the same who chant "ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK" at totally inappropriate parts of the game.
Proper WUM you are,jesus Christ.It's always nice to pop onto the forum now and again to remind myself why I don't usually bother.
Heaven forbid someone to have an opinion without the key board warriors starting the abuse without any sensible retort.
I imagine the same illiterate cowards actually like us losing and it was better in the old bad days.
I like to win and have characters and winners in my club.
Nasri is neither and I am hopfull Pep can show what a good judge he is by getting rid of fatty.