Champions League and 3rd kit

Perhaps I shouldn't like it but I do. The more garish the better - I'm a bit of a weird fucker like that! Biggest problem for me with the Nike kits is the fitting - even though I've lost a bit of timber they don't fit well unlike the previous Umbro kits.

There's a lot of sports stuff now being sold to the public that comes with a 'professional fit' rather than a comfort fit. So 'professionally fitted' is it that yer can't get yer head through the head hole!
 
Honestly this a tough one.

I should hate it but I like it. Damn you Nike.

Home and away garish btw.

If Nike don't nail it with home and away kits next season they can fuck off.

We are the onlly side in England that still have Nike as their supplier still. There must be a reason for that.
 
i like it, i dont take LSD and i'm 32.
It's a 3rd kit guys, it's supposed to be fun/different and taken lightly.

(and Chelsea are switching to Nike)
 
It's an abomination of a kit. I didn't like the ghost green one either.
I don't know why they can't keep it simple*:
First kit - City blue
Second kit - Red and black stripes or maroon,
Third kit - White

Of course I know that the answer to my question is: marketing opportunities but I guess we just need to be glad that we are not one of those clubs with a pink shirt.
 
if it's Pink for breast cancer awareness. then that's ok as a one off.
pink for the sake of pink..not so much.
 
It looks ok on the younger players,not so much the others,it's made for the junior blues market i suppose,we really should have a song about it
 
There's some posters on this thread with serious insecurities about their sexuality.

It's 2016. Nobody cares anymore.
24vptes.jpg
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top