City v Saints post match

Clatt's might just have been the boy to make that controversial decision methinks!!!
Seriously? Referees aren't interested in time wasting, unless the result spoils their accumulator. They'll book the odd token player to show they're "in command", but that's it. I remember one match last season when we took the lead near the end and (ahem) "slowed the game down", and the referee was telling our players to get on with it! For the previous 75 minutes he was quite content to let them do the same thing without saying a dicky bird.
 
I'm no tactical genius but dosnt playing 3 at the back just give bravo one less option /target when he wants to play out from the back?
Thinking as stones passed back central for the goal instead of to the right back
Also why has fernandinho stopped dropping to pick the ball from bravo ?
The mini slump seems to have coincided with giving sane and gundaguan more game time and dropping nolito who has been one of our better players ?
Makes sense to me
 
It seems you are questioning the idea that we will correct this, is that the case ?

We are fucked basically ?

If not, why the question ?

1) Have you seen any signs that Pep has put any learnings into practice
2) The players seem to agree with peps "were not good enough"statement. We've not won since he made it.
3) Not if we learn & quickly. We've pissed away a 5 point advantage in 3 games
4) What ?
 
I'm no tactical genius but dosnt playing 3 at the back just give bravo one less option /target when he wants to play out from the back?
Thinking as stones passed back central for the goal instead of to the right back
Also why has fernandinho stopped dropping to pick the ball from bravo ?
The mini slump seems to have coincided with giving sane and gundaguan more game time and dropping nolito who has been one of our better players ?

Quite like Gundogan as a player but him coming into the team does seem to have had a detrimental effect in some regards. When Fern was on his tod it was working perfectly with him dropping into the middle as the centre halves split and the full backs came in-field. It made the pitch appear massive with loads of space all over the shop. Both Silva & De Bruyne were also playing brilliantly when deeper. Having an extra body in the field makes the pitch suddenly appear cluttered.

Given the players we have I also don't think three at the back works for us. Our back four was basically a back two + Fern at the start of the season. A back three negates the need for Fern to drop so again leaves less space in the mid, which is especially exacerbated if Gundogen starts in there as well.

A back three works well with attacking wing-backs coming from deep, our back three has wide men who are too far forward too soon.

Go back to a back four / two, let Fern drop in, bring back Silva & De Bruyne, and Robert's your proverbial uncle
 
I'm no tactical genius but dosnt playing 3 at the back just give bravo one less option /target when he wants to play out from the back?
Thinking as stones passed back central for the goal instead of to the right back
Bravo was definitely in the game a lot less yesterday than he is when we have 4 at the back.
 
Seriously? Referees aren't interested in time wasting, unless the result spoils their accumulator. They'll book the odd token player to show they're "in command", but that's it. I remember one match last season when we took the lead near the end and (ahem) "slowed the game down", and the referee was telling our players to get on with it! For the previous 75 minutes he was quite content to let them do the same thing without saying a dicky bird.

Forster was booked after the 90th minute was up for something he had been doing since the tenth minute. Timewasting is a mandatory yellow card but refs just allow it go on, and on, and on until around the 87th minute we get the token gesture. Instead of farting about with the laws of the game that allows kick offs to be kicked backwards now, we should stipulate that a goalkeeper has a specified MAXIMUM time to put the ball in play or it reverts to a corner for the attacking side. 'Tis the only thing I can think of that will get goalkeeping sluggards to get their arses in gear. I can just imagine a beleaguered centre back having a sympathetic word for a goalie when he has to traipse back twenty yards into his own goal area to defend another corner. Same goes for throw ins! But not penalties!!!
 
Quite like Gundogan as a player but him coming into the team does seem to have had a detrimental effect in some regards. When Fern was on his tod it was working perfectly with him dropping into the middle as the centre halves split and the full backs came in-field. It made the pitch appear massive with loads of space all over the shop. Both Silva & De Bruyne were also playing brilliantly when deeper. Having an extra body in the field makes the pitch suddenly appear cluttered.

Given the players we have I also don't think three at the back works for us. Our back four was basically a back two + Fern at the start of the season. A back three negates the need for Fern to drop so again leaves less space in the mid, which is especially exacerbated if Gundogen starts in there as well.

A back three works well with attacking wing-backs coming from deep, our back three has wide men who are too far forward too soon.

Go back to a back four / two, let Fern drop in, bring back Silva & De Bruyne, and Robert's your proverbial uncle
Agree with that yesterday bravo had 3 options of playing it out ,with nothing on the right side,where as with the back 4 he was getting 5 options with fern dropping between the centre half's.not sure many English teams have won anything playing with a back 3 tho quite a lot have tried it and ditched it after a few games.
Although Vinny was rusty as you would expect he looked really uncomfortable with all the side foot passing ,and I think him reverting to conventional defender caught stones out a bit as Vinny pushed up instead of him dropping off for the goal
 
Forster was booked after the 90th minute was up for something he had been doing since the tenth minute. Timewasting is a mandatory yellow card but refs just allow it go on, and on, and on until around the 87th minute we get the token gesture. Instead of farting about with the laws of the game that allows kick offs to be kicked backwards now, we should stipulate that a goalkeeper has a specified MAXIMUM time to put the ball in play or it reverts to a corner for the attacking side. 'Tis the only thing I can think of that will get goalkeeping sluggards to get their arses in gear. I can just imagine a beleaguered centre back having a sympathetic word for a goalie when he has to traipse back twenty yards into his own goal area to defend another corner. Same goes for throw ins! But not penalties!!!
Great idea. Not sure about max time though. Perhaps a warning from ref that next slow mo will be penalised by a corner. Same for throw in's. Not sure how you deal with another growing trend i.e. going down in the box under pretence of a head injury in a bid to stop game and waste time.
 
Since we lost the game to Spurs are performances have got steadily worse. The 1st half performance was the worst in a long time, I can't remember a performance that bad under MP. The only good thing to come out of yesterday's game, is that the 2nd half performance was 100% better than what went on in the 1st half. What's that now no wins in 5 games, that's not an ideal run with Barcalona coming next Tues. The next 2games have got to be won.
 
Great idea. Not sure about max time though. Perhaps a warning from ref that next slow mo will be penalised by a corner. Same for throw in's. Not sure how you deal with another growing trend i.e. going down in the box under pretence of a head injury in a bid to stop game and waste time.
Goal kicks - 15 seconds
Throw ins - 10 seconds
Both from the time the goalie/player has the ball in their control. If over the time, it becomes a corner/throw in to the opposition.
Either that, or as I said earlier, the clock starts when the ball is kicked/thrown.

I thought the Laws say that if you were "injured", you should be treated OFF the pitch. Again, if the clock is stopped, it's irrelevant how much time is taken. The clock only restarts when the referee blows his whistle for the game to continue.

What could possibly go wrong?

;-)
 
Great idea. Not sure about max time though. Perhaps a warning from ref that next slow mo will be penalised by a corner. Same for throw in's. Not sure how you deal with another growing trend i.e. going down in the box under pretence of a head injury in a bid to stop game and waste time.

You're over complicating it. If the goalie is deliberately wasting time it's a warning, next time he does it it's a booking. If he does it again it's a sending off. If Clattenburg does that in the first half there would have been no problems. Frankly, booking him in the 90th minute was an insult and just shows he wasn't applying the laws for the other 90 minutes.
 
For interest those criticising the ref yesterday .the referee accesser was or very own Richard jobson and his comment was clattenburg did alright,which is probably fair enough
 
I thought the performance was alright. I can take a mistake from Stones but not even looking at Kompany as he passed it was unacceptable. Hopefully Pep gives him a kick up the arse and removes this nonchalant behaviour from his game. If Kolarov had done that we'd have ripped him to shreds. Speaking of which, I think Kolarov had a pretty solid game, Navas at right-back might be an option should we need it, Vincent escaped injury-free and our three youngsters up front all did well. In that second half I was sat right up close to where Sterling spent a lot of the game and I think he put in a mature performance. Aguero and De Bruyne need a few games off to get their shit together as both are ineffective right now. The point of having Iheanacho is that he can come in when Aguero's not in-form and I think Kelechi should definitely start on Wednesday. Southampton's time-wasting was much too much and out of order and more should be done to combat it in the PL.

Some of Pep's substitutions are great but some are completely baffling. We needed a goal so why was Nolito left on the sidelines until it was far too late?

This winless run needs to end- lucky we have a nice easy game next. On that note we still haven't had any of the newly promoted teams from which we really should be getting at least fifteen points across the season.
 
Since we lost the game to Spurs are performances have got steadily worse. The 1st half performance was the worst in a long time, I can't remember a performance that bad under MP. The only good thing to come out of yesterday's game, is that the 2nd half performance was 100% better than what went on in the 1st half. What's that now no wins in 5 games, that's not an ideal run with Barcalona coming next Tues. The next 2games have got to be won.

So you think we were worse against Everton than Spurs?
 
Since we lost the game to Spurs are performances have got steadily worse. The 1st half performance was the worst in a long time, I can't remember a performance that bad under MP. The only good thing to come out of yesterday's game, is that the 2nd half performance was 100% better than what went on in the 1st half. What's that now no wins in 5 games, that's not an ideal run with Barcalona coming next Tues. The next 2games have got to be won.

Not true - we played very well against Everton and would have won comfortably but for the penalties and Steckelenburg having a career day he prob will never repeat. We also were very competitive against Barca until Bravo's fuck-up. Sometimes you get a run of games where the ball just wont go in the net. Things ran for us the first ten games. Now they are not. Luck in general (unlike ref decisions) does even out in the long run.
 
Great idea. Not sure about max time though. Perhaps a warning from ref that next slow mo will be penalised by a corner. Same for throw in's. Not sure how you deal with another growing trend i.e. going down in the box under pretence of a head injury in a bid to stop game and waste time.

We do what Rugby Union do. Treat 'em on the pitch and play round 'em! Once that became a law then the 'head injuries' would vanish within a couple of games.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top