blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
It's a sign of how bad he always is that his performance yesterday wasn't even in his 3 worst against us in the last 18 months.
Walton is the head of referees in the States! If you think the refs are bad in England?! OMG, they are 10x worse over here!The new Peter Walton.
Madley is a shite referee, but just watched Stoke v Bournemouth highlights and East is the worst referee I have seen in my life.
That Shawcross challenge was a stone wall penalty this guy needs to be struck off.
Don't think East has reffed a City game yet this season ? You watch now he will be the ref against Burnley.
Saw that myself and quickly had to reappraise my thoughts on Madley's incompetence. By comparison he was outstanding!
We have the resources to dominate football for years yet the officials seem happy to fuck us up at every opportunity. How do we get done most fouls with huge possession on a weekly basis?
East is equally fucking terrible, a snidey looking fucker to boot, wouldn't be confident with him in charge of any City gameMadley is a shite referee, but just watched Stoke v Bournemouth highlights and East is the worst referee I have seen in my life.
That Shawcross challenge was a stone wall penalty this guy needs to be struck off.
Don't think East has reffed a City game yet this season ? You watch now he will be the ref against Burnley.
In the last 10 minutes he abdicated making any decisions at all.I thought he let a lot go on both sides to be honest
In the last 10 minutes he abdicated making any decisions at all.
One thing that the authorities need to find a way of dealing with, is time wasting. Madeley did give their keeper the hurry up a few times at 1-1, so we can assume some of the 5 minutes was for time wasting by them (who would have been delighted with a point), but then when we take a late and deserved lead, they then get the benefit of their wasted time to try and equalise.
No idea what can be done about it, but it does my head in that a team can time waste for 45 minutes, and then when they deservedly go behind late on, they then get the benefit of their own time wasting.
I agree that the ball needs to be in play more, but there would still have to be some protocol as to how it was done, when do you add time on, and when not ? We can't add "all" time on, as games would last hours.Easy. Take it away from them and have game time done from he side.
As fans you get totally cheated with the amount of time the ball isn't in play.
He was the referee last season when we played Everton in the league at home in January. The score ended 0-0 but in the last minute Sterling was taken out by Stones in the box, and, like yesterday, he completely ignored the obvious penalty. He gave Everton a goal kick instead, then blew for time.East is equally fucking terrible, a snidey looking fucker to boot, wouldn't be confident with him in charge of any City game
It works in rugby okI agree that the ball needs to be in play more, but there would still have to be some protocol as to how it was done, when do you add time on, and when not ? We can't add "all" time on, as games would last hours.
Time isnt added on in rugby. The clock is stopped by the referee during playIt works in rugby ok
What works in rugby though ? You don't/can't have time wasting in rugby, not like the keeper walking from one side of his goal to the other to take a goal kick, or a player being replaced taking a minute to leave the pitch, yes you can add that time on, but if the time wasting team then go behind, why should they then benefit from it, and be given extra time to find an equaliser ?It works in rugby ok