Recent content by SilverFox2

And they're just his qualities. I bet he's not as nice as that in real life.

Is it possible he was actually trusting the new people he installed who had zero experience after sacking others. With his own bombastic attitude together with inexperienced yes men he had nobody to play devil's advocate during his time to look it over so he presented it as a finished article.

He likes the way how Mr P has harnessed the Russian budgets to delegate parts to his clique who shall we say reserve a percentage of that for Mr P personally. Russia has always been Mafia infested but Mr P has shown how it can be used at Gov level.Mr Trump likes this and is importing it to USA...

Exactly, City have never been against rules that don't suit us only ones that delay or could potentially stop our financial progress (which obviously includes costs as well as income). If any other team in the PL doesn't like the way how we vote then try emulating the City Business Plan which...

Sheikh M most certainly bought City as an investment. Whilst battling against a red cartel dominated PL he appears to be on a Crusade for fairness only but rest assured he only wants rule changes that benefit the City Business Plan. Anything wrong with voting for things that will further his...

I posted this on the Paramount+ deal thread but I wonder if the PL and CL are getting time to get some long term financial deals in place before the 115+ verdict is given

He seems to be doing a PL and throwing everything into a last try 115+ bucket list of clauses.

I wonder if the PL will be getting all it's financial deals done before the verdict of the 115+ is announced? I know the Panel are supposed to be remote from PL but I am thinking it is to everyone's benefit to get the best deal.

It's served it's purpose in allowing the media to ignore a 3-0 defeat by an improving City.

Many thanks Colin for that detailed reply. I can see how suspicions were raised especially when our business plan had a few years to run before we were finished with owner investment. How right they were to try to stop City early doors. They were terrified of our owners investment plans from the...

I suppose in a way rather than being inconvenienced by it the KCs are grateful for the extra work they can charge out as one offs rather than having to group them together. If the PL have to pay I'm sure the individual Clubs will understand why.

If we had been Arsenal or Man I and a new regime came in to vet them I would agree with you but we have had multiple eyes on us for years so perhaps your reasoning is unlikely but thanks for reply.

Thanks for reply. Sorry I did edit my post to mention the inconvenience it causes the KCs so hopefully annoy them as well.

Thanks for reply, on the point of multiple charge for same "offence", would the Panel be able to comment on how this has been allowed to drift year upon year. If they knew it was an offence yesteryear what possible reason is there to allow it to continue? Unless of course it is part of...

There are at least 115 separate charges. Each one will need 3 separate decisions or is this incorrect?