Search results

Good point, never thought of it that way.

Do you think it was a deliberate attempt to tie up our legal team with individual yet similar cases or was it simply the only way to appease a red cartel pressure?

Just wonder what their currency trend really means today. By that I mean many years ago when trying to trade with the newer Russia everything was using the US dollar as the basis to do any business (even their version of the mafia). The rouble was simply ignored as a serious currency. I am...

Thanks mate. I continue to learn but am frankly not needing to be up to date these days. Great to see you and Stefan exchanging logic with legal process. Good to see Stefan inch by inch educating the media at the same time as Lord Pannick is defeating our enemies. Keep up the good work my friend.

Perhaps I should stick to enjoying my retirement rather than embarking on a journalistic career. Point taken.

. Not an original thought but it looks as though the PL threw the kitchen sink accusation at us to busy our legal team while they worked on tightening up the APT etc. They were using attrition on APT one to vote through much more biased rules using the aero interest allowance to win the slow but...

Not saying you are wrong but perhaps we are having to be attritional rather than win or lose with all our legal arguments,? Certainly the PL have had to conform by obeying UK law at Panel and we have won some points recently. In future the PL are likely to ensure legality of any changes they...

That is all I want really because my mistrust formed when the Panel was drawn up solely by PL. If they follow the process I am sure a fair result will ensue. If they don't follow the process fairness is not demonstrated. Thanks Stefan.

Thanks for spelling out Mr Lewis s reason to reassign his legal ownership of Spurs. It was quite generous of him to extend his knowledge to people close to him but a bit like the PL he felt he was above the legal requirements.

Recently Mr Lewis from Spurs transferred ownership to his family after indiscretions regarding stock market knowledge. Not the same I know but City seem to have a structure in place that protects any serious personal attack on Sheikh M..

I think it is fair to say that it is solely the UK media who continually are against us. Not saying the global media does not occasionally have a go but you do right to ignore the domestic media lies and biased views.

From a football point of view maybe not. From a legal point of view maybe the PL stifled ourr need to rebuild by stopping a sponsorship deal and making purchasing players a lottery. If 115 found to be a PL disaster as expected we have compensation claims in abundance. We are City and will...

Think we have enough evidence to claim massive compensation that their false charges interfered with our rebuild program.

I think this is the season for rebuild unfortunately stagnated by thee 115 accusations and the sponsorship issues. 4 on the trot followed by what the PL want seems as though our compo claim is gathering momentum. We shall follow our team whatever happens and have been torpedoed by false...

Apologies my friend.

If so apologies to all concerned. Scott is one of the select few I respect and have learnt from. Unlike me I know but I can get sensitive when i see a true City star getting stick.

Back the man, more of a journalist than 95 percent of those currently operating despite leaving the profession to do great work on a totally different sector. His contacts still trust him as do most posters on BM.

Is it fair to say City have got most of what they wanted before the Panel decision so opposing the PL vote was simply to ensure that the 90 percent win occurred before the result. The Panel result may give us more but not at the risk of losing any of the gains and all we lose is a pawn of a vote...

Is that not what they already are doing?