Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Forum rules
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
slbsn's latest activity
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
The risk is real
Today at 10:46 AM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
Thanks. PS sorry to disappoint but more than happy to advance my career/income streams though (not that 115 in itself has done that)
Yesterday at 7:15 PM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
Last reply. Believe who and what you like. But I am not making it up.
Yesterday at 11:27 AM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
Honestly, don't be so naive. Or at least be open minded enough to accept that the club has a plan for some possible negative outcomes...
Yesterday at 11:16 AM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
None of it is welcomed. Not one bit
Yesterday at 10:28 AM
S
slbsn
reacted to
Pughie's post
in the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
with
Like
.
The fans are obviously very frustrated and impatient now that it's dragging on, and you seem to be bearing the brunt of that...
Yesterday at 10:03 AM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
Apologies. I didn’t realise anyone on here really believed City “welcomed” this whole fiasco. It’s PR not reality. But sure, take it at...
Yesterday at 10:03 AM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
This is my final reply to this crap. Believe what you like. Believe who you like. Believe I speak to a range of people to get as clear a...
Yesterday at 8:37 AM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
I never said they did publicly. But surely you can’t be that naive - there is a difference between PR and the real world. Only fools...
Yesterday at 7:12 AM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
MAY say
Yesterday at 12:04 AM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
I’ve said that. Almost no chance of anything but a high award of our costs (which means 90%) unless the Commission says the claim was...
Wednesday at 11:58 PM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
I never said that. But likewise I’m hardly likely to tell you who I speak to. But it’s not just one individual that acknowledges there...
Wednesday at 11:51 PM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
I don't reply to every question. And the answer to this one is pretty obvious.
Wednesday at 8:34 PM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
Comfort yourself however you like. What I’ve written is fact on not just based on generalisations. City are confident but not certain or...
Wednesday at 7:45 PM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
I said City are confident. I mentioned soft signals multiple times in the past. They are confident. But they don't KNOW and acknowledge...
Wednesday at 4:12 PM
Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!
SIGN UP
Forums
Members
Back
Top