Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Forum rules
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
slbsn's latest activity
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
No. I think the point is that the club won’t be in the slightest bit bothered by a tweet. But had an expectation of some objectivity in...
Yesterday at 7:57 PM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
As usual, the simpler explanation is to be preferred. I just didn’t think it was very likely or convincing. From what I can recall of...
Yesterday at 7:35 PM
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
It’s regularly debated and articulated in various ways. But it’s still BoP.
15 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
I think if 1/3 died (say) it’s pretty likely we’d be in retrial territory unless the parties agreed otherwise
15 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
No - full details here https://open.substack.com/pub/stefanborson/p/conspiracy-theories-and-innuendo?r=2b1e30&utm_medium=ios
15 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
No doubt there are cases somewhere against an arbitrator (City themselves alleged potential bias) but not realistically about duration...
15 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
Briefly, before the fear of the greatest collapse in PL history distracted me
15 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
No change. I’ve always felt sooner better for City but recognised an extended period before a decision may be unrelated to the detail of...
15 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
As of Friday, I don’t believe so. I think we are very close to calling it a day for 2025
15 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
The standard is not “without doubt”. It is on a balance of probabilities. I wouldn’t jump to your conclusion
14 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
Hard to see how it is not a sporting advantage case. And admission and cooperation should only be a 30% discount as opposed to turning...
11 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
That’s correct but I don’t think that’s a contradiction. The PL is a FA governed tournament but moreover Chelsea are a FA governed club...
11 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
I don't believe so but no PL club has had a FA deduction so partly untrodden. But as it is clear the FA oversee the PL and points...
10 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
They won't be. This is all Chelsea PR - nobody buys it.
10 Dec 2025
S
slbsn
replied to the thread
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
.
Pure Chelsea PR. And total nonsense. The self reporting incentive is a) because they have to b) taken into account with the discount to...
10 Dec 2025
Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!
SIGN UP
Forums
Members
Back
Top