If UEFA do change this, then I guess PSG getting deep into French Football sponsorship and deep into UEFA committees will have had a lot to do with it.
From a summary a french user did, the change is due to the recent rulings in favour of Milan AC, Galatasaray, PSG by TAS.
There are several reactions and talks at UEFA and some members are saying it will become less and less possible to use FFP in its current form and even risky to go into trials against those rich clubs (contrary to the small clubs that can't fight against FFP and can be forced to comply).
They are unanimous about Manchester City, since Football Leaks revelations, with a supposed financial system based on image rights that allow them to circumvent FFP and an investigation has been launched. City, on the other hand, is waiting for the results of that investigation and is using the fact that those documents have been illegally obtained through massive hack of private informations as their defence.
Ceferin doesn't want to make any comment but keeps repeating that FFP initial goal has been met, since european football has become a lot healthier with introduction of FFP in 2011 with 600 M benefices now from 1.7 billion accumulated losses before.
UEFA knows they could face a lot of complicated legal procedures in the future, so they think about simplifying some rules without ditching the whole FFP concept.
Among those rules, the instances wouldn't seek to control the origin of the money or how it is spent but will only verify if clubs finances stay in the green side.
For example, they would prioritize controls over clubs that don't pay the salary of players or club employees.
However, whatever route UEFA chose to follow in the future, PSG and Manchester City are still the targets now, especially PSG that enter the period where they need to justify Neymar and Mbappé acquisition in their books.
