The kind of leveraged takeover with which the Glazers "bought" United is perfectly legal in the UK but is not, I believe, in the USA. Providing interest free loans, as Abramovitch has done, is clearly not illegal and so the scope for UEFA to take action is probably limited if they wish to avoid challenge in the courts. The irony is, of course, that UEFA chose to duck out of possible collision with those who pose a real risk to clubs and genuine danger to the game, to try and make it impossible for owners, who wish to invest in their clubs to make them more competitive and provide a better product for fans to watch, actually to invest in their clubs. One of the people asked by UEFA to draw up the FFP regulations resigned because he believed unlimited owner investment to be essential for the professional game to progress. This has been stated many, many tomes, of course, and by many, many different people - let's hope that, at long last, UEFA are seeing sense.