TheRemainsOfTheDave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 6,491
Haha, I need my EYES testing.Hales?
Roy.
Haha, I need my EYES testing.Hales?
Roy.
The picture they showed with Archer not having bowled a single ball that would have hit the stumps was strange.
Plunkett always bowls short as it's harder to hit far if the ball is straight. I think he's pretty important to how England bowl, as there's not a lot of variety or imagination.
The picture they showed with Archer not having bowled a single ball that would have hit the stumps was strange.
Plunkett always bowls short as it's harder to hit far if the ball is straight. I think he's pretty important to how England bowl, as there's not a lot of variety or imagination.
I know how plunkett usually bowls but this is a pitch up wicket and conditions as the wicket just showed.
England in a good position now because it's not a strong batting lineup they're up against but don't be surprised if they're three down in ten overs against Boult and Henry. They won't waste a single ball with this back of a length rubbish.
But that’s how VAR should work,offside, not offside, no re-reffing of opinionated on field decisions, VAR is so clandestine as well, anyway that’s for another thread.But everything is yes/no stuff. There is no interpretation involved. Just like tennis, it's a game that lends itself to video assistance.
This didn’t age well either!