nmc
Well-Known Member
So following correct procedure means giving the accused a chance to defend themselves and judging the defence evidence fairly and on its merits. Also justifying their reasoning in a consistent manner?
So that means CAS will look at out evidence and not just the procedure of the case? So for example if UEFA followed all correct procedure but didnt come to a reasonable and fair judgement it would be overturned?
I think UEFAs biggest weakness is having their Chair negotiating a compromise. Totally undermines any pretence of independence in the AC body.