UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
I cant deny that all this has upset me quite a bit last few days.
I lost my dad last year and still struggling to come to terms with it. He took me to Maine road and we had some good times.
I think we will get cleared but with VAR and the constant attacks on our club are making me contemplate not renewing and giving up on the game completely.
Maybe that was the authorities plan all along, I'm not sure anymore.
This crisis, like being relegated to Div 3, will galvanise the whole club and our fanbase. City fans usually respond well in a crisis. Sorry about your dad. I was working in Tameside today and stopped and talked to a couple of City fans I saw wearing our colours. It cheered me up no end. Remember don't let the bastards grind you down.
 
I cant deny that all this has upset me quite a bit last few days.
I lost my dad last year and still struggling to come to terms with it. He took me to Maine road and we had some good times.
I think we will get cleared but with VAR and the constant attacks on our club are making me contemplate not renewing and giving up on the game completely.
Maybe that was the authorities plan all along, I'm not sure anymore.
Hi Matt,

sorry for your loss, I lost my dad too last year on March 12th. My dad took me to Maine Road on the Platt Lane benches from 1976 my first game.

if he was here now he would want me and all of us to stick with City.

if we go to League 2 or even lower !

I'll never forget the first home game v Blackpool in League 2 . When the boys ran out the hairs on my neck stood on end !

when our backs are to the wall we come together better than any other fan base.

strip our titles, strip our FA cups, our League cups too ! I don't care

I know the game is corrupt!

But come the first league home game in League 2 there WILL be 55,000 inside the Etihad ! The old boys will come out of the woodwork ! The real heart and soul of the club will stand shoulder to shoulder!

Once again the hairs will stand up on the back of our necks !

Stick with it Matt !

CTID
 
It's shocking when you think that those leagues in Germany and Italy used to be competitive and great to watch. UEFA has done everything it can to preserve the status of Bayern and Juve. The bizarre thing in Germany is that most fans hate Bayern but they hate the new money clubs like Leipzig and Wolfsburg even more. If one of the new clubs could hole Bayern under the water (like we did to the Rags) it would open the door for lots of other contenders. Football fans are their own worst enemies sometimes. We should really form an allliance with Chelsea to take on the establishment here but it will never happen. Imagine if the progressive clubs with money like us, Chelsea, Everton, Wolves perhaps joined forces to force change.

Count Chelsea out, they went native years ago, they were in favour of ffp.
 
That’s what I’ve been thinking.

Are they playing us and UEFA good and proper?

What does the tradecraft tell you?

geoge-smiley_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqNJjoeBT78QIaYdkJdEY4CnGTJFJS74MYhNY6w3GNbO8.jpg


I suspect Karla.
 
You're thankfully mistaken on this.

R57 Scope of Panel’s Review, Hearing

The Panel has full power to review the facts and the law. It may issue a new decision which replaces the decision challenged or annul the decision and refer the case back to the previous instance. The President of the Panel may request communication of the file of the federation, association or sports-related body, whose decision is the subject of the appeal. Upon transfer of the CAS file to the Panel, the President of the Panel shall issue directions in connection with the hearing for the examination of the parties, the witnesses and the experts, as well as for the oral arguments.

After consulting the parties, the Panel may, if it deems itself to be sufficiently well informed, decide not to hold a hearing. At the hearing, the proceedings take place in camera, unless the parties agree otherwise. At the request of a physical person who is party to the proceedings, a public hearing should be held if the matter is of a disciplinary nature. Such request may however be denied in the interest of morals, public order, national security, where the interests of minors or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice, where the proceedings are exclusively related to questions of law or where a hearing held in first instance was already public.

The Panel has discretion to exclude evidence presented by the parties if it was available to them or could reasonably have been discovered by them before the challenged decision was rendered. Articles R44.2 and R44.3 shall also apply.

If any of the parties, or any of its witnesses, having been duly summoned, fails to appear, the Panel may nevertheless proceed with the hearing and render an award.


Thanks for that and hopefully I am wrong
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.