Search results

Be interested to learn if the 2000 (or 3000) 'VIPs' and hangers-on will also be subject to the same rules. Doubt it somehow

Where were you when we were..... No wait.

Small club, no history, empty seats, Stockport et cetera

C Correct answer

Oh they care alright Every article about City in the Guardian, for example, attracts their negative comments as they try to undermine our success. If they didn't care, they wouldn't bother to comment.

Intellectual football Manchester City - the intellectuals

We're all going to IST-AN-BUL

Stu-fecking-pendous

Mine was signed: Yours sincerely Sorryano

Can we still boooooo the Champions League anthem?

I 'definately' don't agree with slagging off our owners. Martin Samuel and others have stated City and Chelsea were reluctant and the last of the 6 to sign up. We've signed up so as not to miss out, but of course we HAVE signed up so we are henceforth one of the sell-outs as far as all other...

At no point in the game did I think we might/could/should score. Really depressing to watch.

The goal celebration was absolutely nuclear. One of the most charged up I can ever remember

Magnificent

The Duke of Stockport?

93.20 That's it. That's the comment

'Dirty oil money' is a spurious argument. It's all about money per se. At the moment we have access to more of it than most other clubs - and we use it well. That's what riles them. Bunch of snarky, snidey tw*ts.

I've never understood the negative connotation with oil money, often referred to as 'dirty oil money'. It's an extremely valuable commodity which everyone uses every day. Why do so many opposition fans think it is somehow worse than, say, hedge fund money?

Been really struggling with little rivers recently. They all seem to have upstream dams blocking the free flow of water. Any suggestions?

Anyone else struggling with intermittent tributaries. Solution?