Search results

If anyone managed to catch it, the Chief Executive of Etihad was on Iain King in Sky News business hour between 4.30-5pm today? He was asked a few questions about their involvement with City and the recent case. King at one stage asked if Etihad would ever sponsored a different club in the...

I don't think it is Harris. There will be some bad faith actors but society just mimics others. Most are just needing it to be true, regardless of guilt, due to allegiances elsewhere. People will read what they want in to the findings, but it really doesn't matter, just our ability to continue...

Ta bud.

Exactly. To highlight the extent of this smear, I did an intervention yesterday for a nine-year-old kid who hasn't left his bed for ten weeks and not attended school. I've built up a rapport because he likes football and changed him from a supposed Red to a Blue, now wearing my kids' old City...

Not quietly confident, supremely. To the point, it feels like they already know the result.

Everything in disclosure, as you rightly state. I mean, it's quite ridiculous to think the Premier League would have held back a smoking gun which would save them £25m in legal fees, just to have their gotcha moment in court. It would never have got to court.

That team in 2017/18 wasn't a bad one, either!

Defo need to get back on the horse. It's never been about losses for us. It's the amount of draws which usually kill a title challenge.

We're on one? We haven't lost a Premier League game since last December!

South, Level 2.

It's already been up there for the visitors section.

Even that is a snide attempt at a smear.

Matt Lawton is in charge. That desk is a direct conduit to Arsenal executives and has led the way in the leaking of legal processes concerning City. They will have received a steer and had to couch it after trying to distance themselves previously from one of their writers married to Arsenal's...

Haha. Lost all credibility when he wrote seems and potential.

Good luck mate.

Even with your dodgy knee?

It didn't do us much fucking good for 35 years did it?

Plays both.

Barella is the one!

Ziegler has already given a window to the verdict in his piece today. It's clearly a steer the Premier League have fallen foul on Executives having to justify why a sponsorship deal is worth what it is :)