Search results

Oldschool.

Not sure it does, more applying laws that already exist to social media. Which I have no issue with. It all depends on your starting position imo. If it is that there is no conspiracy against the white brit, and that the government, the police and the legal system are not out to get the...

Of course not. But doesn't really answer my question.

Extreme triple-reverse clarkie 180°.

We had no such problem with Idles. Just saying.

Notable clarkie mentions btw, belfry and bimbo.

Why? If it is something that breaks the law on the street, in the workplace, in society, etc - why should it be ok on social media?

Posted my results before seeing doogles guesses, we were probably simultaneous typing. Will edit now, hang tight.

So here are your results. Guessing champions: B&W - 4.5 Threespires - 4 Rob - 3 LG - 2 Hammer - 2 Doogle - 2 Sadds - 1 There was a tie at first place, but given there were two idles songs, anyone guessing the right poster but not the song got a half point, which separated it in the end. Not...

He read it on here ;)

Said some nobody on twitter. He was never due such a thing. Both our club's statement, and Sporting's said summer. January was never a believable scenario. Two active directors of football at a club? And 0 at Sporting! Aye sure.

Why? This was always the case btw, and always made sense. The guy is a director of football, at a top European club. He is not an apprentice joiner that needs to shadow Txiki for 6 months to learn the basics. It was one of the daftest claims by ITKs/KFAs for some time.

What happens if it doesn't?

No shit.

Don't be daft. All he has to do is announce his decision, and Rodri will magically instantly heal, and all the muscles and ligaments in all the other players will suddenly recover. What's the hold-up!

@RobMCFC I take it you know Crowded House have a new album out.

Nope. Just remembering some of the lows. Good to reminisce.

You sure?

That's not really true ;)

Isn't that always the case?