Search results

Then there's zero harm in hoping a City journo clears it up.

This is not "every rumor". This is a release clause in a marquee signing's contract that lets him leave after two seasons of a five year contract. It's not a small detail.

Never heard that! But would love it to be the case for this particular signing.

No, it's just Gus' opinion on BILD. He still thinks the guy who tweeted is the author. When someone who reports on City says it does or doesn't exist then we'll be at the bottom of it.

You make comments like this and then play victim when people have a go back at you....

As others said, BILD is reporting there's a release clause in his City contract after two seasons.

Really hoping some of the City journo's get to the bottom of the Haaland release clause.

The money that was quoted last summer was around 50 million. That number is going to fall once Leeds are relegated.

Name a midfielder City have a chance to buy this summer that immediately slots in to the Rodri or 6/8 role as an improvement on Rodri or Bernardo/Kevin? We're signing for depth in the midfield. Whoever comes has to be comfortable with that.

Fantastic post.

Wouldn't need to be. He's there for depth for Rodri. I don't think we're signing anyone that's going to displace Rodri this summer.

Surely we should be in for Phillips if Leeds go down.

He's objectively not with 12 months left on his deal.

Really? I'd think it'd be the opposite for adding depth. They'd want to stay where they are getting to play every single week to make their respective teams.

I would snap Arsenal's hand off for 42 million for Jesus.

Wonder what price gets the Gabby deal done? £35m seems low but maybe we take less than we should to not have to deal with Italian clubs.

Here's this from The Times.

Not me, but i'm glad someone has.

Help's that he plays for free, apparently!

I would, but it'd be the same excuse. "I don't write the headlines".