Search results

Lol, nice one. It probably won’t ignite any more.

Your morning constitutional?

I can understand a fine but why the fuck would we accept any kind of transfer ban just for a non cooperation charge, way over the top IMO.

Behave yourself. It was a genuine question. Always someone who has to be an arsehole about it.

That’s the only explanation that fits funnily enough.

All very well but it negates the ‘City won’t pay above valuation/worth’ strategy, surely?

Did City really want him? The reason I ask is that City obviously have a valuation they will not go beyond for a particular player, right? So, why did City pay £100M 2 years ago for Jack? I know it was his release clause but as good as Jack is now he was way overvalued at £100M 2 years ago...

Weren’t we going ‘huge’ in this window (again)?

Tony Cascarino: "Trent has qualities that are not far off Lionel Messi" YCNMIU

I think he also won the top European scorer award (across all leagues), not sure what it's called.

You can pick them up online or on ebay quite easily mate.

Good point mate, forgot about them moving about a bit. Edit: Yes you are correct, both at Wembley.

We did actually win there twice under Pep in 2018, 3-1 and 1-0.

The draw with Liverpool.

I remember your tweet when the news came through. Such a huge relief.

Haven't seen anyone mention this but is it not slightly concerning that Pep is asking for the verdict sooner? Surely he would have had reassurances from the club that everything will be OK? Or has he?

Don’t know whether it’s been asked yet? How have the PL been able to level the charge of false accounting? What have they seen in our accounts that is false? To make a charge they must have seen something, they can’t have just made it up surely? I understand the other charges around Mancini...

Haha, reminds me of when Neville was up against Petrov in the Vincent Kompany testimonial.

Exactly, I said similar to someone a couple of weeks back who was bemoaning the points they had dropped to cut their lead. I pointed out that City could also look at points dropped that allowed Arsenal to build a lead in the first place and that the league is won or lost over 38 games, not 3 or 4.

What was that all about then?