Almost definitely not. They’ve overturned it because the rags appealed. You’d need a club to request a player of another to be given a retrospective ban presumably and the answer would be ‘no. The ref and var made their decision’
I actually didn’t think it was a red, but this is ridiculous
I thought they didn’t want to re referee the games?
The ref has looked it and said red
The VAR has looked at it and not overturned it
Now it’s been looked at again - literally after the game has finished - and been overturned
Am I being pessimistic - Surely there is just no point discussing amendments to rules that are awaiting the verdict of a hearing?
Hope we’ve shagged them up the arse, however
Haven’t been able to find an NHS dentist for love nor money so gonna have to go private
How does denplan work, I’m assuming it’s not as simple as you pay every month and they cover the cost of treatment?
No we wouldn’t. Playing through a back ten of Arsenal’s quality and organisation is almost impossible. If they’d left their own box, maybe so, but not the way the set up for the second half
Can you fucking imagine if Haaland became the first player in history to play 89 minutes in a premier league game without making a pass?! Arsenal did it twice. They’re a rich Stoke
Can’t find the original post from the person saying why haven’t we just taking the alleged offered 6 point deduction for an easier life
Would you take a reduced sentence of 5 years for a crime you haven’t, and can you prove you haven’t, committed?
Remember when United used to ram it down our throats about what they were winning when we were shit
Now their whole existence is pinned on city losing a court case
‘No one cares about city’
Bitter rag cunts. Drink it in