Search results

I thought United was minor breach and we did not know how much they failed by. That amount they should have resulted in serious sanctions not tiny fine

Well yes but I am just saying that we do not know what will happen to the hotel and perhaps no one would buy it well other than Chelsea’s owner what was the loosing bid

But this sale has only just been mentioned in the press. After sanction of Everton and Nottingham Forrest which came after the accounting period so surely any sanction or not is still to come

How much is Chelsea hotel worth ? I mean the figure seems high but it’s London and it could be worth more if the ground is redeveloped on the other hand it could be worth less if the redevelopment means knocking it down or relocating Chelsea no away fans. I thought I read it has been loosing...

So we are sure they have passed PSR for the period when they sold this ?

You’re a historic club with a good fan base new stadium and not a threat to the big boys. The just what the premier league want far better than likes of Luton Bournemouth etc with small grounds. I would say you have got off lightly with ur last points deduction

How do we know it’s allowed ? I thought these things happened then the premier league looked at them

I do not see the point in signing him

Going to be very last minute finish for co op assume they will get it done some how tho

With these losses plus worse predicted next year surely they are certain to face minimum 10 point deduction or relegation ? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13304083/Chelsea-financial-disaster-revealed-Blue-Premier-League.html Plus they are still under investigation for off...

The media turned on us as soon as we got taken over

Why would the premier league have an agenda against Everton that’s just daft

We looked at him before and didn’t go for him.I thought he would have been a good buy but. I don’t know now I don’t watch him but seems he plays in a different formation and in midfield and often off the bench so not sure he is right or good enough plus are there not people saying he doesn’t...

Makes sense but there should never have been any issues it should have been wages not counted or possibly wages and amortization. I do not understand how they complicated it and how they where allowed to changed or what those changes are anyway it is what it is

I have never really understood the change that was made it never made any sense to me can you please explain

So we buy some 8 and who do they replace ? Nunes, Kovacic, Foden, DeBryne, Grealish, Bernardo ? Rodri is the one that needs resting he is the one asking for a rest we need a DM who can play other positions if needs be, Perhaps an older player Wont mind missing games or a very young player might...

We do not need Paqueta

I do not agree Seems the Fordham scheme was more like Barcelona pulling leavers. Us selling image rights for an up front fee large lump sum to lower losses (more tax) in exchange for lower income in future periods when we had lower Losses anyway and less need for the income

Do not agree Fordham was more like Barcelona pulling leavers we sold image rights for an up front large lump sum to avoid loses paid more (more tax) in exchange for no or less income in future as they where in the hands of an outside company

Would be mad to sign him if he was found to have broken the rules don’t think we need him either way