£50m bid

supercrystal7 said:
bluechampion7891 said:
Dortmund would be foolish not to entertain a big bid for hummels who is a good footballer but not the best of defenders.
i don't see much positive in selling your club captain. Hummels is a good footballer and a good defender. This year the system has failed more than anything. He probably should show better judgement, but you cannot have the defence rushing out like Klopp wants, but have no pressure on the ball like they have often had. At the same time they have changed the back four so often that there is usually someone not moving up in line with the others.

In the last 5 years he has played in a CL final, won the world cup and 2 Bundesliga titles. In an ideal world you play him alongside a defender with pace and he can be brilliant. Still only 26 too.

Would be well suited to City then...
 
Any updates on this bid tolmie? Thread has died away from the initial burst of positivity! :-(
 
richards30 said:
malg said:
The paper talk is Barkley again.

Would be FUMING if we paid £30m for barkley let alone £50m!! Didn't tolmie say it wasn't barkley anyway?
I would rather pay £30 million for Barkley than £50 million for Sterling.We wouldn't get him for £30 million.
 
Thenumber1blue said:
richards30 said:
malg said:
The paper talk is Barkley again.

Would be FUMING if we paid £30m for barkley let alone £50m!! Didn't tolmie say it wasn't barkley anyway?
I would rather pay £30 million for Barkley than £50 million for Sterling.We wouldn't get him for £30 million.

Isn't sterling coming into the last year off his contract?
 
richards30 said:
Thenumber1blue said:
richards30 said:
Would be FUMING if we paid £30m for barkley let alone £50m!! Didn't tolmie say it wasn't barkley anyway?
I would rather pay £30 million for Barkley than £50 million for Sterling.We wouldn't get him for £30 million.

Isn't sterling coming into the last year off his contract?
2 years left I think. The dippers don't want to get into the last year of his contract so will sell this summer if he won't sign.
 
If we pay 50M for Barkley it'll be embarassing.
He's not worth anything like that amount, if he wasn't home grown we wouldn't even be looking at him.
 
bluemoon32 said:
If we pay 50M for Barkley it'll be embarassing.
He's not worth anything like that amount, if he wasn't home grown we wouldn't even be looking at him.
Once again, it's not Barkley...
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.