Good that they 2 different players. Cherki just couldn’t cope with the pace. Nothing wrong with subbing him.Felt unfair that he got hooked after 55mins.
When Savio stinks the gaff out he gets 85 mins to waste chances.
Good that they 2 different players. Cherki just couldn’t cope with the pace. Nothing wrong with subbing him.Felt unfair that he got hooked after 55mins.
When Savio stinks the gaff out he gets 85 mins to waste chances.
Exactly......a combination of not having experienced that type of pace, and not being 100% 'match' fit yet.Good that they 2 different players. Cherki just couldn’t cope with the pace. Nothing wrong with subbing him.
Was the right move imo, he didn’t play well at all which is fine given he’s been in the league for 5 minutes. I’m not his biggest fan but Sav deserved a run out after his game against DortmundFelt unfair that he got hooked after 55mins.
When Savio stinks the gaff out he gets 85 mins to waste chances.
He’s always a threat and drew players towards him every time he got the ball. Liverpool were clearly worried about him. Didn’t have a bad game at all.was not bad tbf, was just ok, didn't have much looks to create, will learn from it
What was unfair about it?Felt unfair that he got hooked after 55mins.
When Savio stinks the gaff out he gets 85 mins to waste chances.
Yes, with Cherki playing on the wing (inside forward) he leaves the space out wide for Nunes to exploit, whilst also making up the numbers in midfield when needed. As soon as Savi comes on that space out wide for Nunes is blocked.We were better as a team with him than when Savinho came on. We lost some control.
Could have scored with a bit more luck.was not bad tbf, was just ok, didn't have much looks to create, will learn from it