115 Charges - FAQs

Cash paid , benefits in kind , disguised remuneration via loans but in the context of Mancini and the allegation seems to be that there were two contracts.
The question will be do the IC think that the contract with the second club is valid or was it in payment in full or part for work done at City.

So it's all remuneration, in all its forms, for work performed for the club? Seems pretty difficult to prove the second contract was basically fake. Not sure that is going anywhere for a million pounds.
 
wasnt there a point where all arsenal players were getting paid as a company to avoid income tax
Its certainly correct that there were issues re payments and Arsenal


Please only whisper because as we all know Arsenal are above suspicion
 
Last edited:
Arsenal 'in multi-million tax dodge'
Tom Whitehead
Sunday 18 July 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Sign up to Miguel’s Delaney’s free weekly newsletter
Email

I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy notice
The high-profile divorce of Arsenal star Ray Parlour has exposed a multi-million-pound tax dodge at the country's top football club, it was reported last night.

Bonuses paid to players and the manager, amounting to millions each season, are paid in to offshore trusts and secretive front companies to avoid tax, according to The Sunday Times.

The legal, but widely condemned, tactic only emerged when midfielder Parlour had to disclose all his earnings and bonuses during his divorce settlement to ex-wife Karen at the Court of Appeal earlier this month.

Top names at Arsenal are said to sign two contracts, one for their annual basic wage, which is taxed at the normal top rate of 40 per cent, and a second that pays an array of performance-related bonuses, the newspaper said. Bonuses, including rewards for success in the Premiership, FA Cup, European championships and other competitions, can account for up to half of total pay packets.

They are paid via two front companies in to trusts, which can result in no tax or as little as 1 per cent being paid. In one season alone, £7.6m of the club's wage bill is estimated to have been channelled through one of the trusts, with nearly 30 players having to pay a total of just £76,000 tax, the newspaper investigation said. British stars such as Parlour, Ashley Cole and former goalkeeper David Seaman are said to have cut their tax to 25 per cent.

The club has also set up what is known as an employee benefit trust, through which bonuses are "loaned" to players but, in reality, are never paid back. A spokesman for the club told the paper employee contracts were strictly confidential. (PA)

More aboutCourt Of AppealDavid SeamanDivorce And SeparationJusticeMarriageNewspapers And MagazinesTaxUEFA Champions LeagueSunday Times
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments
 
Arsenal 'in multi-million tax dodge'
Tom Whitehead
Sunday 18 July 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Sign up to Miguel’s Delaney’s free weekly newsletter
Email

I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy notice
The high-profile divorce of Arsenal star Ray Parlour has exposed a multi-million-pound tax dodge at the country's top football club, it was reported last night.

Bonuses paid to players and the manager, amounting to millions each season, are paid in to offshore trusts and secretive front companies to avoid tax, according to The Sunday Times.

The legal, but widely condemned, tactic only emerged when midfielder Parlour had to disclose all his earnings and bonuses during his divorce settlement to ex-wife Karen at the Court of Appeal earlier this month.

Top names at Arsenal are said to sign two contracts, one for their annual basic wage, which is taxed at the normal top rate of 40 per cent, and a second that pays an array of performance-related bonuses, the newspaper said. Bonuses, including rewards for success in the Premiership, FA Cup, European championships and other competitions, can account for up to half of total pay packets.

They are paid via two front companies in to trusts, which can result in no tax or as little as 1 per cent being paid. In one season alone, £7.6m of the club's wage bill is estimated to have been channelled through one of the trusts, with nearly 30 players having to pay a total of just £76,000 tax, the newspaper investigation said. British stars such as Parlour, Ashley Cole and former goalkeeper David Seaman are said to have cut their tax to 25 per cent.

The club has also set up what is known as an employee benefit trust, through which bonuses are "loaned" to players but, in reality, are never paid back. A spokesman for the club told the paper employee contracts were strictly confidential. (PA)

More aboutCourt Of AppealDavid SeamanDivorce And SeparationJusticeMarriageNewspapers And MagazinesTaxUEFA Champions LeagueSunday Times
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

from 04 right?
 
Arsenal in dock over £1m 'secret payment'
Nick Harris
Friday 02 June 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Sign up to Miguel’s Delaney’s free weekly newsletter
Email


Sepp Blatter, the president of Fifa, last night told Arsenal to disclose the full details of their financial relationship with the Belgian club Beveren to ascertain whether they have broken any regulations over multiple club ownership or have been guilty of a conflict of interests. The head of football's world governing body intervened after BBC's Newsnight programme revealed that a Belgian police investigation had concluded that Arsenal made secret payments of £1m to Beveren.

Arsenal issued a statement last night, saying they had lent the money in 2001 to a third party who wanted to secure Beveren's future, and denied owning Beveren, directly or indirectly, at any stage. Whether their explanation will be good enough for Fifa remains to be seen.

The payments were made in 2001 in the form of interest-free loans to Raoul de Waele, a business associate of Arsenal's vice-chairman, David Dein. Documents obtained by Newsnight show the money was used to set up a company called Goal, which would take control of Beveren. This happened. The documents show that the loan and other money advanced by Arsenal would be repaid out of Goal's share of transfer profits from selling imported Ivorians and other players. It is not clear when, or how much, money Arsenal received.

In practice, the tie-up gave Arsenal an effective monopoly over the futures of Beveren's many Ivorian players. According to Newsnight, Arsenal funded the Beveren buyout so that Jean Marc Guillou, an old friend of Arsène Wenger, could use it as a staging post to import talented Ivorian players into Europe more easily. Guillou had formerly been the head of the ASEC academy in the Ivory Coast, which produced players including Kolo Touré.

Arsenal bought Touré directly from ASEC in 2002 in a deal that turned sour for ASEC when Guillou left after a dispute with a business partner. Guillou did not have the funds to buy Beveren himself.

Instead the De Waele-controlled Goal, funded by Arsenal's money, took legal control. A director at Beveren told Newsnight that in return for £1m, De Waele was given 50 per cent control of Beveren and Guillou was given another 30 per cent.

Promoted stories
9 In 10 Android Owners Didn't Know How To Block Ads
EXPERTS ON SECURITY
by TaboolaSponsored Links
Christian du Four, the investigating magistrate in the Flemish town of Dendermonde, who began his probe into Beveren under the initial, mistaken, belief that the secretive £1m funding may have been linked to money-laundering, described De Waele as Arsenal's "straw man" on the Beveren board.

If Arsenal did have any formal ownership of Beveren, the conflict of interests would be clear, not least in their transfer dealings. Arsenal bought Emmanuel Eboué from Beveren in January last year.

Arsenal said in a statement last night: "We do not normally make public our agreements with third parties. However, we can confirm we have had a technical relationship with Beveren since 2001.

"This relationship has a number of benefits to both clubs such as providing a platform to share coaching methods and techniques as well as facilitating the option of players being loaned between the clubs.

"During the course of the relationship, Arsenal players David Grondin, Liam Chilvers, John Halls and Graham Stack all spent successful loan periods at Beveren as did Emmanuel Eboué, who played in a number of trial matches with Arsenal whilst contracted to Beveren. Such was the latter player's success, Arsenal subsequently signed Eboué on a permanent basis.

"In addition, we confirm that we have never owned, directly or indirectly, any shares in Beveren or had any power whatsoever to influence its management or administration.

"We did in 2001 provide funds of €1,570,703 (£1.075m) by way of loan to a member of a consortium who used the money to assist in stabilising the finances of Beveren.

"At no time has anyone at Arsenal been contacted by any regulatory or investigatory body with respect to our relationship with Beveren. Arsenal have acted properly throughout, in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations," the club stated.

In a further revelation that will cause embarrassment, if not lead to any formal investigation, Newsnight also obtained documentary evidence that Wenger invested £30,000 of his own money in ASEC between 1997 and 1999 when Guillou was still in charge.

According to one document, it was anticipated that Wenger could expect to make £100,000 from his share of player sales by ASEC.

This raises a clear conflict of interest issue because Arsenal subsequently bought Touré directly from ASEC. But it is understood Arsenal were happy with Wenger investing, and Wenger has since said privately that the money was a donation, not an investment. There is no evidence Wenger was paid any of his money back.

More aboutMotor SportUS SenateDemocrats
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

I found this as well
 
Arsenal in dock over £1m 'secret payment'
Nick Harris
Friday 02 June 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Sign up to Miguel’s Delaney’s free weekly newsletter
Email


Sepp Blatter, the president of Fifa, last night told Arsenal to disclose the full details of their financial relationship with the Belgian club Beveren to ascertain whether they have broken any regulations over multiple club ownership or have been guilty of a conflict of interests. The head of football's world governing body intervened after BBC's Newsnight programme revealed that a Belgian police investigation had concluded that Arsenal made secret payments of £1m to Beveren.

Arsenal issued a statement last night, saying they had lent the money in 2001 to a third party who wanted to secure Beveren's future, and denied owning Beveren, directly or indirectly, at any stage. Whether their explanation will be good enough for Fifa remains to be seen.

The payments were made in 2001 in the form of interest-free loans to Raoul de Waele, a business associate of Arsenal's vice-chairman, David Dein. Documents obtained by Newsnight show the money was used to set up a company called Goal, which would take control of Beveren. This happened. The documents show that the loan and other money advanced by Arsenal would be repaid out of Goal's share of transfer profits from selling imported Ivorians and other players. It is not clear when, or how much, money Arsenal received.

In practice, the tie-up gave Arsenal an effective monopoly over the futures of Beveren's many Ivorian players. According to Newsnight, Arsenal funded the Beveren buyout so that Jean Marc Guillou, an old friend of Arsène Wenger, could use it as a staging post to import talented Ivorian players into Europe more easily. Guillou had formerly been the head of the ASEC academy in the Ivory Coast, which produced players including Kolo Touré.

Arsenal bought Touré directly from ASEC in 2002 in a deal that turned sour for ASEC when Guillou left after a dispute with a business partner. Guillou did not have the funds to buy Beveren himself.

Instead the De Waele-controlled Goal, funded by Arsenal's money, took legal control. A director at Beveren told Newsnight that in return for £1m, De Waele was given 50 per cent control of Beveren and Guillou was given another 30 per cent.

Promoted stories
9 In 10 Android Owners Didn't Know How To Block Ads
EXPERTS ON SECURITY
by TaboolaSponsored Links
Christian du Four, the investigating magistrate in the Flemish town of Dendermonde, who began his probe into Beveren under the initial, mistaken, belief that the secretive £1m funding may have been linked to money-laundering, described De Waele as Arsenal's "straw man" on the Beveren board.

If Arsenal did have any formal ownership of Beveren, the conflict of interests would be clear, not least in their transfer dealings. Arsenal bought Emmanuel Eboué from Beveren in January last year.

Arsenal said in a statement last night: "We do not normally make public our agreements with third parties. However, we can confirm we have had a technical relationship with Beveren since 2001.

"This relationship has a number of benefits to both clubs such as providing a platform to share coaching methods and techniques as well as facilitating the option of players being loaned between the clubs.

"During the course of the relationship, Arsenal players David Grondin, Liam Chilvers, John Halls and Graham Stack all spent successful loan periods at Beveren as did Emmanuel Eboué, who played in a number of trial matches with Arsenal whilst contracted to Beveren. Such was the latter player's success, Arsenal subsequently signed Eboué on a permanent basis.

"In addition, we confirm that we have never owned, directly or indirectly, any shares in Beveren or had any power whatsoever to influence its management or administration.

"We did in 2001 provide funds of €1,570,703 (£1.075m) by way of loan to a member of a consortium who used the money to assist in stabilising the finances of Beveren.

"At no time has anyone at Arsenal been contacted by any regulatory or investigatory body with respect to our relationship with Beveren. Arsenal have acted properly throughout, in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations," the club stated.

In a further revelation that will cause embarrassment, if not lead to any formal investigation, Newsnight also obtained documentary evidence that Wenger invested £30,000 of his own money in ASEC between 1997 and 1999 when Guillou was still in charge.

According to one document, it was anticipated that Wenger could expect to make £100,000 from his share of player sales by ASEC.

This raises a clear conflict of interest issue because Arsenal subsequently bought Touré directly from ASEC. But it is understood Arsenal were happy with Wenger investing, and Wenger has since said privately that the money was a donation, not an investment. There is no evidence Wenger was paid any of his money back.

More aboutMotor SportUS SenateDemocrats
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

I found this as well
Now we know why Dein kept quiet on the Piers Morgan charade about us.Keep the skeletons coming!
 
Arsenal in dock over £1m 'secret payment'
Nick Harris
Friday 02 June 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Sign up to Miguel’s Delaney’s free weekly newsletter
Email


Sepp Blatter, the president of Fifa, last night told Arsenal to disclose the full details of their financial relationship with the Belgian club Beveren to ascertain whether they have broken any regulations over multiple club ownership or have been guilty of a conflict of interests. The head of football's world governing body intervened after BBC's Newsnight programme revealed that a Belgian police investigation had concluded that Arsenal made secret payments of £1m to Beveren.

Arsenal issued a statement last night, saying they had lent the money in 2001 to a third party who wanted to secure Beveren's future, and denied owning Beveren, directly or indirectly, at any stage. Whether their explanation will be good enough for Fifa remains to be seen.

The payments were made in 2001 in the form of interest-free loans to Raoul de Waele, a business associate of Arsenal's vice-chairman, David Dein. Documents obtained by Newsnight show the money was used to set up a company called Goal, which would take control of Beveren. This happened. The documents show that the loan and other money advanced by Arsenal would be repaid out of Goal's share of transfer profits from selling imported Ivorians and other players. It is not clear when, or how much, money Arsenal received.

In practice, the tie-up gave Arsenal an effective monopoly over the futures of Beveren's many Ivorian players. According to Newsnight, Arsenal funded the Beveren buyout so that Jean Marc Guillou, an old friend of Arsène Wenger, could use it as a staging post to import talented Ivorian players into Europe more easily. Guillou had formerly been the head of the ASEC academy in the Ivory Coast, which produced players including Kolo Touré.

Arsenal bought Touré directly from ASEC in 2002 in a deal that turned sour for ASEC when Guillou left after a dispute with a business partner. Guillou did not have the funds to buy Beveren himself.

Instead the De Waele-controlled Goal, funded by Arsenal's money, took legal control. A director at Beveren told Newsnight that in return for £1m, De Waele was given 50 per cent control of Beveren and Guillou was given another 30 per cent.

Promoted stories
9 In 10 Android Owners Didn't Know How To Block Ads
EXPERTS ON SECURITY
by TaboolaSponsored Links
Christian du Four, the investigating magistrate in the Flemish town of Dendermonde, who began his probe into Beveren under the initial, mistaken, belief that the secretive £1m funding may have been linked to money-laundering, described De Waele as Arsenal's "straw man" on the Beveren board.

If Arsenal did have any formal ownership of Beveren, the conflict of interests would be clear, not least in their transfer dealings. Arsenal bought Emmanuel Eboué from Beveren in January last year.

Arsenal said in a statement last night: "We do not normally make public our agreements with third parties. However, we can confirm we have had a technical relationship with Beveren since 2001.

"This relationship has a number of benefits to both clubs such as providing a platform to share coaching methods and techniques as well as facilitating the option of players being loaned between the clubs.

"During the course of the relationship, Arsenal players David Grondin, Liam Chilvers, John Halls and Graham Stack all spent successful loan periods at Beveren as did Emmanuel Eboué, who played in a number of trial matches with Arsenal whilst contracted to Beveren. Such was the latter player's success, Arsenal subsequently signed Eboué on a permanent basis.

"In addition, we confirm that we have never owned, directly or indirectly, any shares in Beveren or had any power whatsoever to influence its management or administration.

"We did in 2001 provide funds of €1,570,703 (£1.075m) by way of loan to a member of a consortium who used the money to assist in stabilising the finances of Beveren.

"At no time has anyone at Arsenal been contacted by any regulatory or investigatory body with respect to our relationship with Beveren. Arsenal have acted properly throughout, in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations," the club stated.

In a further revelation that will cause embarrassment, if not lead to any formal investigation, Newsnight also obtained documentary evidence that Wenger invested £30,000 of his own money in ASEC between 1997 and 1999 when Guillou was still in charge.

According to one document, it was anticipated that Wenger could expect to make £100,000 from his share of player sales by ASEC.

This raises a clear conflict of interest issue because Arsenal subsequently bought Touré directly from ASEC. But it is understood Arsenal were happy with Wenger investing, and Wenger has since said privately that the money was a donation, not an investment. There is no evidence Wenger was paid any of his money back.

More aboutMotor SportUS SenateDemocrats
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

I found this as well

“Sign up to Miguel’s Delaney’s free weekly newsletter”

I’d rather sign up to the Russian army’s recruitment newsletter.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.