Disagree with a lot of this. As someone who’s been involved in this display I just want to make a few points:
- we are the victims, aren’t we? UEFA have gone above and beyond to ban us.
- we don’t want support from the likes of United (Gill), Liverpool (Parry) etc. They are the elite who we’re attacking. Clubs like Newcastle, Everton, West Ham, who are similar to us in not being ‘European elite’ will support this IMO.
- football is tribal at the best of times. We shouldn’t have to count on support from other fans regardless.
- you’re correct about small group of decision makers. But 1894 is an open group (free memberships available now). We’re always trying to get people involved, but few step up and become ‘decision makers’.
- we asked our entire list of members for their ideas, we used a few of them (hence different banners).
- one of the main parts of a display is the shock value and suspense - if everyone knows the display before it happens it takes away from it.
- The main display might not be your cup of tea, but in our defence, if that’s unfurled whilst millions are watching City v Madrid (with UEFA Representatives sat in view), it goes up another level. Out of anyone’s control though with lockdown so had to get it out before court hearing.
I know you’re post isn’t trying to be offensive or rude or anything, and I hope my reply doesn’t come across as touchy. I’m just trying to add a bit of context from the other side.