200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball Videobook MUST WATCH!

Guess what bud? I've done a 30,000 ft tandem skydive and seen it quite clearly for myself. Do you know what evidence means? It means that which I'd seen and I have all the evidence I need to tell you that video is talking shite.

Btw, how do you reckon the Van Allen belts would surround a flat earth? Would they be rectangular belts?
Please watch this or go to 47 secs that at least 110.000 feet a lot higher a lot higher than your tandem and no curve and the vans would be domed like the trueman show maybe I don't have all the answers but I have enough to prove we are not moving do you have any proof that we are besides your subjective views? But I noticed you did not try to rebut NASA when they said "we can not get through the radiation belts" yet yet alone 60/70 years ago.
 
Please watch this or go to 47 secs that at least 110.000 feet a lot higher a lot higher than your tandem and no curve and the vans would be domed like the trueman show maybe I don't have all the answers but I have enough to prove we are not moving do you have any proof that we are besides your subjective views? But I noticed you did not try to rebut NASA when they said "we can not get through the radiation belts" yet yet alone 60/70 years ago.

I don't know about this NASA video but I do know radiation exposure is more about time than level if that helps, try looking up rems measurement. As for your first paragraph I know what I've seen.
 
Is there anyone who can handle this debate who can stay the course and answer any questions Cuddles did not answer one single question I asked I will answer all if I can.
 
If you can not see the curvature from 110,00 feet and you can't measure it from any distance ergo there is no curvature now this is where it gets sticky, no curvature, no ball, no ball, no Gravity and no travelling at 670,000,000 that's 670 Million MPH, 670 Million miles per hour that's what they tell us it's absolute bollocks... but I love the petition vote and I am inn.

Are you near the edge ?
 
Good opportunity for some "Be a Mod" scenario here.

This guy has not posted since July 2014 and the last regular posts were in October 2013.

Now he has come on a City forum proclaiming that the world is actually flat and anyone who disagrees is actually a ball licker on New Years Eve night. This coincides with the banning of a possibly unrelated but maybe not banning of a user who had multiple accounts on here.

Do we treat this as face value or do we designate him as a troll?

Any greater thoughts on this Bluemooners?
Are you suggesting banning him for having a bit of sport with you?
 
Is there anyone who can handle this debate who can stay the course and answer any questions Cuddles did not answer one single question I asked I will answer all if I can.

He will be back with a thousand links and articles to disprove this theory. Thats how our cuddles rolls.
 
I don't know about this NASA video but I do know radiation exposure is more about time than level if that helps, try looking up rems measurement. As for your first paragraph I know what I've seen.
Extreme Gamma radiation kills all living things they had no radiation protection on Apollo or in their suits and NASA admit as evidenced by the video they can NOT get through the 3 gamma radiation belts and one low jump strapped to someone else does not give the big hat pal.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.