gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
The ultimate question for these half wits is that if the current £35m/£60m figure is too high what should the figure be for a club that's finished 3rd/1st/2nd/1st/2nd in the last five seasons in the richest, most widely broadcast sporting product on the planet?Bollocks. We still don't have an Official Noodle Partner. Nor, unlike Everton (Everton FFS) do we have an Official Ginger Beer.
Seriously, when the morons on RAWK etc shout that a huge part of our commercial revenue comes from Abu Dhabi, what they don't realise is THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT! The Abu Dhabi government want the name of Abu Dhabi and its major companies out there. I'd love to know what the Etihad deal has done for their brand awareness, how much of their increase in revenue and the move from loss to profit is due to it. Also, as we know, it's now looking distinctly poor value in light of other deals. Unlike kit deals, which relate fairly directly to the amount of branded kit sold, a shirt and stadium naming deal is more about exposure. And they're certainly getting their money's worth from us.
But even if it wasn't Etihad, it would be someone else and we'd be getting the market rate. So let's say we get £60m a year from Abu Dhabi companies currently, we'd still probably get something like £40m for the shirt, stadium and campus. So we'd drop £20m. Big deal.
I'd love a straight answer to that question, not that I'll get one.