2014/15 accounts released - £10.7m profit

Bollocks. We still don't have an Official Noodle Partner. Nor, unlike Everton (Everton FFS) do we have an Official Ginger Beer.

Seriously, when the morons on RAWK etc shout that a huge part of our commercial revenue comes from Abu Dhabi, what they don't realise is THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT! The Abu Dhabi government want the name of Abu Dhabi and its major companies out there. I'd love to know what the Etihad deal has done for their brand awareness, how much of their increase in revenue and the move from loss to profit is due to it. Also, as we know, it's now looking distinctly poor value in light of other deals. Unlike kit deals, which relate fairly directly to the amount of branded kit sold, a shirt and stadium naming deal is more about exposure. And they're certainly getting their money's worth from us.

But even if it wasn't Etihad, it would be someone else and we'd be getting the market rate. So let's say we get £60m a year from Abu Dhabi companies currently, we'd still probably get something like £40m for the shirt, stadium and campus. So we'd drop £20m. Big deal.
The ultimate question for these half wits is that if the current £35m/£60m figure is too high what should the figure be for a club that's finished 3rd/1st/2nd/1st/2nd in the last five seasons in the richest, most widely broadcast sporting product on the planet?

I'd love a straight answer to that question, not that I'll get one.
 
In the interests of balance I feel compelled to counter what you've said to suggest that the Etihad deal was very favourable to us at its inception. It was clearly 'front-loaded' based on our standing at the time and gave us a significant cash injection on generous terms.

It is equally right, however, to state that Etihad have been enormous beneficiaries from the arrangement. Their standing and exposure as an organisation has increased hugely in the last half-decade; and, further, that the deal now stands due to be revised significantly upwards, due to our contemporary status in the game.

Both City and Etihad have mutually benefitted to an enormous extent from this arrangement. Capitalism at its finest. A real win/win.

You could almost describe it as "doing things the right way" if you were so inclined.

The point I was trying, badly(!), to make was that £40m a year over 10 years probably did appear excessive to outsiders at the time: we were in the early stages of our growth and yes I agree we did need the money upfront because of FFP;Etihad though were aware of the overall football market and it's potential for growth. Crucially they were also aware of exactly who Sheikh Mansour was which other non Abu Dhabi companies probably weren't. A lot thought that City was merely a vanity project. Etihad I'm sure knew that "The Sheikh" wouldn't get bored.

I agree it is capitalism at it's finest and "doing things the right way". LOL.
 
Last edited:
Our Etihad deal is apparently dodgy. Whilst their Chrysler deal is much larger and resulted in some boardroom level sackings! Chrysler, that company who have no UK presence.
 
Seriously, when the morons on RAWK etc shout that a huge part of our commercial revenue comes from Abu Dhabi, what they don't realise is THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT! The Abu Dhabi government want the name of Abu Dhabi and its major companies out there. I'd love to know what the Etihad deal has done for their brand awareness, how much of their increase in revenue and the move from loss to profit is due to it.

The average Joe on rival football forums has probably not grasped this point yet although I'm pretty sure Bayern Munich saw this side of things from day one. It's pretty much how they operate hence their hostility to us. I actually think in the long term Sheikh Mansour may well get all his money back, or more, directly from the profits City generate over the next 20 years. What is beyond doubt is that he will make a fortune in Manchester on property given his close relationship with MCC. I also think he'll do the same in NYC and Melbourne. On every level his and Abu Dhabi's involvement with the club is sound business. Wonder what Swales would make of it all?
 
I would agree with the mutual benefit of the Etihad deal for club and airline during the first 6 years. I would now say, depending on the value of the renegotiated deal, City are possibly getting less than market value if you broke it down and compared with similar deals:
Training Kit £16m/yr (Liverpool)
Training Ground £20m/yr (United)
Shirt Sponsors £40m/yr (Chelsea)
This is without even including stadium naming rights. It could also be argued the Etihad Campus has much more brand value than United's Carrington base due its central location, wider facilities, community involvement, metrolink stop branding etc.
 
Running an entity that is both registering profit and debt free, with a positive trend in recent years. That is a strong testament of things to come in the financial side.
We are in the preliminary stages of preparing an offer for the UK and dependent territories (Merseyside, Trafford, Leeds &c.).
Good news in my eyes. Big congratulations to everyone involved in the running of our great club.
You are welcome.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.