Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 57,552
How do you judge the loss of one over from 11?The extra 5 runs from DLS seems a bit of a harsh change. Nearly 13 an over!
How do you judge the loss of one over from 11?The extra 5 runs from DLS seems a bit of a harsh change. Nearly 13 an over!
It’s not when for 80% of their innings England thought they had an extra over. Bullshit really with how short the break was they couldn’t just let us have 11 overs anywayThe extra 5 runs from DLS seems a bit of a harsh change. Nearly 13 an over!
How do you judge the loss of one over from 11?
True, but you could argue that we’d have probably got more than 4 in the over lost.No idea - particularly when it messed up having the one extra over from Wiese taken away with 2 overs to go.
It often seems unreasonable in very short games.
True, but you could argue that we’d have probably got more than 4 in the over lost.
????Looking at the numbers alone, that's true.
I'm not convinced that it made any difference to how England approached the innings though - 10 or 11 overs, and it would have been much the same.
As I said, it often appears/feels disproportionate in short slogs, even though it'll be based on stats.
It won't make any difference to the outcome - Namibia won't get past about 75 anyway.
Er........ Namibia won't get past about 75 anyway.
It's a fixed formula, not judged ;-)How do you judge the loss of one over from 11?