if he had missed a couple of good chances he would be getting battered , oh wait , he is getting battered anywayJust wish people would stop talking about his 22 minute cameo as if it was a 120 minute performance.
We missed 9, yes NINE chances across both legs and sterling missed none of them but still being scapegoatedif he had missed a couple of good chances he would be getting battered , oh wait , he is getting battered anyway
Doesn’t that tell you that people have had their fill of him and his £300k a week?We missed 9, yes NINE chances across both legs and sterling missed none of them but still being scapegoated
Thats because he continually loses possession and fails to do anything productive far too often for a premiership player, we would be much better off without him - cash in now while he is still worth something to us - I think Newcastle would suit him fine.I go onto the Foden thread, people are either praising him or making excuses for his poor performance across both legs. I go onto the Mahrez thread and there are 3 posts about his performance last night, and he was terrible for 70 minutes. And then I come onto sterling’s thread, the guy who played 25 minutes across both legs and didn’t miss one chance compared to the 5 between the other two, and guess what 4 or 5 pages of abuse and criticism. You try and tell me that’s fair treatment of a player.
Hope you have a crystal ballSterling record last year has been poor to say the least, his goals have been against primarily relegation level opposition.
6 of his 10 goals have come against teams getting relegated and he scored against Newcastle when they were in relegation zone as well.
Watford 1 (3-1)
Wolves 1 (1-0)
Newcastle 1 (4-0)
Lester 2 (6-3)
Norwich 3 (4-0)
Everton 1 (3-0)
Norwich 1 (5-0)
Statistics of just total number of goals at 10 is misleading and hiding a poor performance that can be seen every game.