9/11 Conspiracy?

Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

Matty said:
RobinJo said:
CFCnibs said:
RobinJo said:
Just been watching it at college, and find it all very intriguing. Lecturer was telling me the Americans did it to install fear in terrorists.
I really don't get why the Americans would do this, someone explain :-)

Or your views on whether you believe it was a conspiracy or not. But it all seems very strange.

Your lecturer actually said that?

Was he just putting to you a possible theory or does he actually believe that? If so that is extremely worrying that we have such idiots lecturing these days.


Yeah, I said I don't see how or why they would kill several thousand of their own people. And he replied to intall fear in terrorists.
Terrorists blow themselves up inorder to kill those around them, what exactly are they going to be scared off?!!!!!! Your lecturer, especially working in America, is treading on some very thin ice if he's teaching impressionable young minds this kind of consiracy bullshit. I don't know the ins and outs of the patriot act, but he'd be seriously close to breaching it.


Well I won't be enclosing anymore info about him, as I like the guy :-)
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

Matty said:
RobinJo said:
CFCnibs said:
RobinJo said:
Just been watching it at college, and find it all very intriguing. Lecturer was telling me the Americans did it to install fear in terrorists.
I really don't get why the Americans would do this, someone explain :-)

Or your views on whether you believe it was a conspiracy or not. But it all seems very strange.

Your lecturer actually said that?

Was he just putting to you a possible theory or does he actually believe that? If so that is extremely worrying that we have such idiots lecturing these days.


Yeah, I said I don't see how or why they would kill several thousand of their own people. And he replied to intall fear in terrorists.
Terrorists blow themselves up inorder to kill those around them, what exactly are they going to be scared off?!!!!!! Your lecturer, especially working in America, is treading on some very thin ice if he's teaching impressionable young minds this kind of consiracy bullshit. I don't know the ins and outs of the patriot act, but he'd be seriously close to breaching it.

what ever happend to free speech fredom of thought? people will kill themselves in acts of terror for what ever god they believe in as to sorry for goin off the topic in a sense that religion is a mind control on how they get these people to carry out these acts.

MATTY DO YOU WORK FOR THE GOV? AM I ALOUD TO ASK OR ARE QUESTIONS BANNED NOW?
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

cbeebies is poo said:
CFCnibs said:
RobinJo said:
Just been watching it at college, and find it all very intriguing. Lecturer was telling me the Americans did it to install fear in terrorists.
I really don't get why the Americans would do this, someone explain :-)

Or your views on whether you believe it was a conspiracy or not. But it all seems very strange.

Your lecturer actually said that?

Was he just putting to you a possible theory or does he actually believe that? If so that is extremely worrying that we have such idiots lecturing these days.

that is great that you have a lecture that speakds what he thinks. dont get me wrong he should not empower his views on you but should keep you open minded.
im sorry but if thats the attitude you have about education i feel for you. education is about thinking question things. not believe everything they tell you just because a teacher tells you.
if we carry on down the route of believe what they say we all think the same indivduality goes out the window the gov will make up what ever they want and we will all think the same BIG BROTHER? DONT QUESTION JUST BAAAAAAAAAAAAAA BAAAAAAAAAAAA LIKE THE OTHER SHEEP
Is that directed at me?

I'm all for people having their own views on things but this lecturer sounds like a complete jerk.

EVERYTHING points to 9/11 being the terrible act of some very misguided extremists.
Of course it only takes one bright spark to say "of course America might have ochestrated 9/11 themselves......................." and you get all sorts jumping on the bandwagon with their conspiracy theories.

It's bollocks.
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

Seen a few programmes showing both sides and accept why the towers came down as they did, and why it looked like there were explosions beneath the collapse.

But there was another building that came down like a demolition that hadnt been damaged and i have yet to hear an explanation for it.

People look for conspiracies in all these sorts of things and that won't go away. It was a terrorist act of that i'm sure but can see where these theories start.
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

cbeebies is poo said:
what ever happend to free speech fredom of thought?

You can think what you want. However this guy is a teacher, it's his job to educate not to pass his own personal, controversial and idiotic rantings on to those he's teaching.

cbeebies is poo said:
people will kill themselves in acts of terror for what ever god they believe in as to sorry for goin off the topic in a sense that religion is a mind control on how they get these people to carry out these acts.

I'm not sure what you're getting at here, although punctuation would have helped!. I'm no fan of religion and don't believe in God in any way shape or form.

cbeebies is poo said:
MATTY DO YOU WORK FOR THE GOV? AM I ALOUD TO ASK OR ARE QUESTIONS BANNED NOW?
No, I work for an IS company. Questions aren't banned, never have been, never been suggested they will be.
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

johnmc said:
Seen a few programmes showing both sides and accept why the towers came down as they did, and why it looked like there were explosions beneath the collapse.

But there was another building that came down like a demolition that hadnt been damaged and i have yet to hear an explanation for it.

People look for conspiracies in all these sorts of things and that won't go away. It was a terrorist act of that i'm sure but can see where these theories start.
Many people find it far too scary that a group of blokes from the Middle East could concoct such a scheme, implement it and suceed so spectacularly in their aims. It's far more palatable, and less frightening, for them t say "It couldn't just be your average bloke on the street, it must be some huge government conspiracy, a one off that will never happen again. Good, feel better about that now, where's my twinkie?".
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

Matty said:
forevercity said:
hahahahaha check you out getting all worked up! the comment about the 10metre hole being strange is what i believe to be strange! can you tell me why a plane crashing into a building will cause such a small hole and no noticable damage tothe surrounding areas? i like to sit on the fence on these debates, i find both views interesting.

i also find it amusing that you are a mod and you are causing aggressive debate (calling posters morons, saying they lack intelligence etc).

all views are welcome on this thread(unless Matty disagree's with you, then you are called a moron). Also, this thread has generated 4 pages in about 10 (?) mins. So its obvious people want to discuss it, not just call people with other views morons etc.
I say it as I see it, if people think terrorists didn't commit the attacks on 9/11 then they are, in fact, morons. I can't help the fact they're morons.

Taking the question "can you tell me why a plane crashing into a building will cause such a small hole and no noticable damage to the surrounding areas?" I'll say no, based on the fact I don't know enough about structural engineering or plane crash investigation. However, lets just say, for arguments sake, that the reason there was no surrounding damage, and the hole was so small, is because the damage wasn't caused by a plane, but a bomb, or a missile. This still leaves the question "Where did the plane that officially crashed into the Pentagon go if it didn't, in fact, crash into the Pentagon?" Can you answer that?

Lets just say, for arguments sake, they could prove that it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon, or atleast not the commercial plane. Why do they need to answer where the commercial plane, and passengers, went?
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

Matty said:
johnmc said:
Seen a few programmes showing both sides and accept why the towers came down as they did, and why it looked like there were explosions beneath the collapse.

But there was another building that came down like a demolition that hadnt been damaged and i have yet to hear an explanation for it.

People look for conspiracies in all these sorts of things and that won't go away. It was a terrorist act of that i'm sure but can see where these theories start.
Many people find it far too scary that a group of blokes from the Middle East could concoct such a scheme, implement it and suceed so spectacularly in their aims. It's far more palatable, and less frightening, for them t say "It couldn't just be your average bloke on the street, it must be some huge government conspiracy, a one off that will never happen again. Good, feel better about that now, where's my twinkie?".

do you think you could be anymore patronising matty?
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

ElanJo said:
Lets just say, for arguments sake, they could prove that it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon, or at least not the commercial plane. Why do they need to answer where the commercial plane, and passengers, went?
IF they could prove it then they wouldn't have to answer the question. By proving it they'd have also proved that the passengers didn't die by hitting the Pentagon. However they HAVEN'T proved it. Conspiracists claim they have evidence, that they deem conclusive, to state the plane didn't hit the Pentagon. They don't. If they did then they'd be asking about the real whereabouts of the plane. What they have are a selection of blurry, inconclusive pictures showing nothing much of any worth. They are then applying extremely biased and subjective analysis to these images and claiming it to be scientific proof.
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

forevercity said:
Matty said:
johnmc said:
Seen a few programmes showing both sides and accept why the towers came down as they did, and why it looked like there were explosions beneath the collapse.

But there was another building that came down like a demolition that hadnt been damaged and i have yet to hear an explanation for it.

People look for conspiracies in all these sorts of things and that won't go away. It was a terrorist act of that i'm sure but can see where these theories start.
Many people find it far too scary that a group of blokes from the Middle East could concoct such a scheme, implement it and suceed so spectacularly in their aims. It's far more palatable, and less frightening, for them t say "It couldn't just be your average bloke on the street, it must be some huge government conspiracy, a one off that will never happen again. Good, feel better about that now, where's my twinkie?".

do you think you could be anymore patronising matty?

If I tried, yeah. Do I think conspiracy theorists could be any more insulting to the thousands who died in these terrorist attacks? No.
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

how about switching to the "landing on the moon" conspiracy where no innocent lives were lost? - imo proves beyond a shadow of doubt that we are fed bullshit by governments and media alike, fucking tin-can lands on the moon and takes off again...pmsl.
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

I'm confused.

Okay this is farout, but if this was ever proved to be a government scheme, do you think Blair and co knew about it?
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

Rammy Blue said:
how about switching to the "landing on the moon" conspiracy where no innocent lives were lost? - imo proves beyond a shadow of doubt that we are fed bullsh!t by governments and media alike, fucking tin-can lands on the moon and takes off again...pmsl.

The titanic was an insurance job as well
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

johnmc said:
Rammy Blue said:
how about switching to the "landing on the moon" conspiracy where no innocent lives were lost? - imo proves beyond a shadow of doubt that we are fed bullsh!t by governments and media alike, fucking tin-can lands on the moon and takes off again...pmsl.

The titanic was an insurance job as well

LOL
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

johnmc said:
Rammy Blue said:
how about switching to the "landing on the moon" conspiracy where no innocent lives were lost? - imo proves beyond a shadow of doubt that we are fed bullsh!t by governments and media alike, fucking tin-can lands on the moon and takes off again...pmsl.

The titanic was an insurance job as well

was it?
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

Rammy Blue said:
how about switching to the "landing on the moon" conspiracy where no innocent lives were lost? - imo proves beyond a shadow of doubt that we are fed bullshit by governments and media alike, fucking tin-can lands on the moon and takes off again...pmsl.
Maybe there was a moon landing, maybe there wasn't. I wasn't alive to experience it at the time, and the only coverage is an extremely grainy camera of people bouncing about in spacesuits. It would be possible to fake it, as people couldn't see it happen with their own eyes, and the quality of recording devices was pretty poor. Whether it was faked however I'm not sure, I can see why they would fake it (space race with the USSR, communism etc) and by faking it no-one was hurt. Personally, although I accept the government does lie to the people, and would have no qualms about lying in this instance, I don't think they did. It''s been nearly 40 years since the 'moon landing' and the best conspiracy theorists can come up with is some unconvincing issues surrounding flag movement and shadows.
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

RobinJo said:
I'm confused.

Okay this is farout, but if this was ever proved to be a government scheme, do you think Blair and co knew about it?

IF it was a government conspiracy then the USA would have kept it as quiet as possible, it's entirely possible Bush wouldn't have known about it, let alone Blair. Of course this is all conjecture as it clearly wasn't a conspiracy.
 
Re: 9/11 Conspiracy.

Matty said:
ElanJo said:
Lets just say, for arguments sake, they could prove that it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon, or at least not the commercial plane. Why do they need to answer where the commercial plane, and passengers, went?
IF they could prove it then they wouldn't have to answer the question. ......

Right, so, we both agree, asking them is irrelevant.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top