the film is interesting and good, but the book is much, much better. don't take it for burgess's vision of a reality that would inevitably come to be. it was a vision of reality as it might be, a vision that serves burgess's purpose... as it happened, the pampered psycopathic teenagers are a fact of life, pre-teenagers, even.... the difference is that they don't even have the culture of alex and his droogs. the violence of real life is, to me, in fact more horrible, but that's not the point. I think burgess was making a point to the establishment by having alex listen to beethoven, that, whilst having these trappings of civilisation were not the same thing as being civilised, music evokes alex's authentic base responses as well as his 'precious' sense of wonder. it's the heartless, inauthentic, cynical system, the ambitious politicians and psychologists, who try to create a version of humanity without any of these things, that are Burgess's targets. the music and art are more 'real' than what the politicians are trying to sell us. the higher parts of our minds are a fact of humanity, but so are the violent urges of young males. the noble parts of alex are just not that interesting to politicians, but.... you can make a career out of kidding people that you can make humanity perfect, editing out the parts you don't like.