A new stick has appeared

[fat boy blue]

just one thing to say Aguerooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

 

[01282]

And to think the fuckers took the piss out of Liverpool by calling their TV channel The History Channel. United fans are turning into scousers and it is official.

 

[Ell-ano]

one of my rag mates said to me ''i'd be embarrassed if we won the league on goal difference'' i just laughed and said, i bet you would hahahaha what a joke, made me laugh, anyway, the best we can hope for next year is 2nd, the rags always come strong in the 2nd half of the season

 

[ANewEra...]

so did you enjoy watching that football through ww2 on mutv yesterday

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

They come out with a fresh excuse/mantra every day. Here's a selection along with my stock responses.

1. You spent a billion pounds to buy the title.
A. Erm, no, we spent less than half that amount on transfers. However, if we're now going to include the purchase price of a club, then the Glazer's first title cost £1.2bn.
2. You spent a billion pounds [stifle loud yawn here] and only won it on goal difference.
A. The margin of victory is irrelevant because City have no control over the performance of others. What is unarguable though is that we recorded the 6th highest points total in the 38 game Premiership history and the biggest goal difference ever.
3. We won our trophies with self generated income from our previous successes.
A. Leaving the argument of whether it's more noble to get your
cash from a sugar daddy or the kind of oriental armchair embarrassments who turned up at a City match in Kuala Lumpur yesterday in order to unfurl a "Manchester (a city none of them has ever been to) is red" banner, to one side, the rags comprehensively bought their first title after Taggart was given a small fortune to buy 15 new players between 1988 and 1991.
This money did not come courtesy of any previous success as they hadn't had any for 20 years. Subsequent titles were shamelessly bought courtesy of membership of the self perpetuating Chimps League cartel, with all those who were not members effectively nobbled before the race had even started.
4. Injuries cost us the title.
A. Ah yes, the famous injury crisis. This amounted to Vidic, a player hardly missed given that Camelgob, Smalling, Duncan Edwards and Evans were all able to fill in, Cleverley, so integral to the rag cause that he'd spent the previous 2 seasons on loan at Wigan and Luton, and lastly, Fletcher, a player whose replacement, Scholes, was duly wanked over by all and sundry for the next 4 months, so not really a keenly felt loss, eh?

Personally, I prefer to respond to any of these excuses with "fuck off you bitter rag bastard cnut......Aguerrroooooo!!!"

 

[Bodicoteblue]

Meanwhile, there's the glazers pimping the rags out in New York presumably to try and raise the money to erm try and umm buy the err title back

 

[BoyBlue_1985]

They come out with a fresh excuse/mantra every day. Here's a selection along with my stock responses.

1. You spent a billion pounds to buy the title.
A. Erm, no, we spent less than half that amount on transfers. However, if we're now going to include the purchase price of a club, then the Glazer's first title cost £1.2bn.
2. You spent a billion pounds [stifle loud yawn here] and only won it on goal difference.
A. The margin of victory is irrelevant because City have no control over the performance of others. What is unarguable though is that we recorded the 6th highest points total in the 38 game Premiership history and the biggest goal difference ever.
3. We won our trophies with self generated income from our previous successes.
A. Leaving the argument of whether it's more noble to get your
cash from a sugar daddy or the kind of oriental armchair embarrassments who turned up at a City match in Kuala Lumpur yesterday in order to unfurl a "Manchester (a city none of them has ever been to) is red" banner, to one side, the rags comprehensively bought their first title after Taggart was given a small fortune to buy 15 new players between 1988 and 1991.
This money did not come courtesy of any previous success as they hadn't had any for 20 years. Subsequent titles were shamelessly bought courtesy of membership of the self perpetuating Chimps League cartel, with all those who were not members effectively nobbled before the race had even started.
4. Injuries cost us the title.
A. Ah yes, the famous injury crisis. This amounted to Vidic, a player hardly missed given that Camelgob, Smalling, Duncan Edwards and Evans were all able to fill in, Cleverley, so integral to the rag cause that he'd spent the previous 2 seasons on loan at Wigan and Luton, and lastly, Fletcher, a player whose replacement, Scholes, was duly wanked over by all and sundry for the next 4 months, so not really a keenly felt loss, eh?

Personally, I prefer to respond to any of these excuses with "fuck off you bitter rag bastard cnut......Aguerrroooooo!!!"

Just so you get it all right it was Watford ;)

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

They come out with a fresh excuse/mantra every day. Here's a selection along with my stock responses.

1. You spent a billion pounds to buy the title.
A. Erm, no, we spent less than half that amount on transfers. However, if we're now going to include the purchase price of a club, then the Glazer's first title cost £1.2bn.
2. You spent a billion pounds [stifle loud yawn here] and only won it on goal difference.
A. The margin of victory is irrelevant because City have no control over the performance of others. What is unarguable though is that we recorded the 6th highest points total in the 38 game Premiership history and the biggest goal difference ever.
3. We won our trophies with self generated income from our previous successes.
A. Leaving the argument of whether it's more noble to get your
cash from a sugar daddy or the kind of oriental armchair embarrassments who turned up at a City match in Kuala Lumpur yesterday in order to unfurl a "Manchester (a city none of them has ever been to) is red" banner, to one side, the rags comprehensively bought their first title after Taggart was given a small fortune to buy 15 new players between 1988 and 1991.
This money did not come courtesy of any previous success as they hadn't had any for 20 years. Subsequent titles were shamelessly bought courtesy of membership of the self perpetuating Chimps League cartel, with all those who were not members effectively nobbled before the race had even started.
4. Injuries cost us the title.
A. Ah yes, the famous injury crisis. This amounted to Vidic, a player hardly missed given that Camelgob, Smalling, Duncan Edwards and Evans were all able to fill in, Cleverley, so integral to the rag cause that he'd spent the previous 2 seasons on loan at Wigan and Luton, and lastly, Fletcher, a player whose replacement, Scholes, was duly wanked over by all and sundry for the next 4 months, so not really a keenly felt loss, eh?

Personally, I prefer to respond to any of these excuses with "fuck off you bitter rag bastard cnut......Aguerrroooooo!!!"

Just so you get it all right it was Watford ;)

Ta!

 

[Impeccable One]

Easy come back on this one; Tell them in the last year, City have won more than 44 times the amount of trophies United have won.

Unfortunately 99% of them will not be able to figure this out ;)

 

[jimharri]

They come out with a fresh excuse/mantra every day. Here's a selection along with my stock responses.

1. You spent a billion pounds to buy the title.
A. Erm, no, we spent less than half that amount on transfers. However, if we're now going to include the purchase price of a club, then the Glazer's first title cost £1.2bn.
2. You spent a billion pounds [stifle loud yawn here] and only won it on goal difference.
A. The margin of victory is irrelevant because City have no control over the performance of others. What is unarguable though is that we recorded the 6th highest points total in the 38 game Premiership history and the biggest goal difference ever.
3. We won our trophies with self generated income from our previous successes.
A. Leaving the argument of whether it's more noble to get your
cash from a sugar daddy or the kind of oriental armchair embarrassments who turned up at a City match in Kuala Lumpur yesterday in order to unfurl a "Manchester (a city none of them has ever been to) is red" banner, to one side, the rags comprehensively bought their first title after Taggart was given a small fortune to buy 15 new players between 1988 and 1991.
This money did not come courtesy of any previous success as they hadn't had any for 20 years. Subsequent titles were shamelessly bought courtesy of membership of the self perpetuating Chimps League cartel, with all those who were not members effectively nobbled before the race had even started.
4. Injuries cost us the title.
A. Ah yes, the famous injury crisis. This amounted to Vidic, a player hardly missed given that Camelgob, Smalling, Duncan Edwards and Evans were all able to fill in, Cleverley, so integral to the rag cause that he'd spent the previous 2 seasons on loan at Wigan and Luton, and lastly, Fletcher, a player whose replacement, Scholes, was duly wanked over by all and sundry for the next 4 months, so not really a keenly felt loss, eh?

Personally, I prefer to respond to any of these excuses with "fuck off you bitter rag bastard cnut......Aguerrroooooo!!!"

Excellent post. However, to be fair to them (and it doesn't come easy!), none of the four players you listed are anywhere near the ability of Vidic. And yes; I am being serious.