This is probably true but the osc is a paid for membership, members do have a right to call on him to supply answers and likewise the club which by definition is linked directly to the Osc has a duty to respond to him. So at the very least, and no ones expecting complete honesty, there should be some sort of statement returned to any question that is then the right of members to see.
I’ve said it before on these threads - if the club came out and said we decide to start increasing our allocations to those who contribute the most financially to the club, ie corporate members and sponsors, that would at least give some clarity. I think what is frustrating is that the allocations for particular games seem so arbitrary in recent seasons. Obviously it’s easier to get a ticket for wolves away than the rags, or Liverpool etc, and that’s always been the case. But there seems to be no consistent system anymore in terms of what points games sell out at given the ticket numbers. Clarity, even if it was initially unpopular, would at least give an explanation.
As it stands, essentially the biggest away games are creating a similar away end as a ballot system would, beyond the truly high points- in that those a little further down the chain have a much chance a someone with zero points, or that doesnt even support the club as their main team.