Shadz69 said:
pauldominic said:
Shadz69 said:
If you can't talk down to them join them.
Are you swp in disguise?
Nah - sorry.
His posting density is beyond me because I have other things I like doing and somehow he manages it while saving the global economy.
I may be mistaken it could have been NF who first used that term.If so are you NF in disguise?
Frankly who cares who used it.
It was a one word response to someone who has posted these things about me: -
"Paul - please do me a huge favour and just shut the fuck up comparing your knowledge of social work having never done the job,with mine having done it for nine years,and having lectured social work students personally.
I actually stated the required qualifications expected of a social worker,if only you could read properly.
Stick around long enough though and I'm sure some topic will eventually come up that you are qualified to pass opinion on.
Although for the life of me I can't imagine just what it would be."
"I'll tell you what you know about social work Paul - a big,fat fuck all,as Zim has pointed out.
What on earth knowledge do you glean from having a partner who does a job that you don't?
Are you so utterly bereft of common sense and logic that you think you can understand the day to day issues that present in a job you have never done?
All you ever do is post some ignorant claptrap about something that others clearly understand better than you do,mainly because they have actually done the job,and then try to rationalise your stupid interventions with yet more ignorance.
When this fails,you try to shit stir and set posters against each other in some sorry attempt to move the goalposts,as you become increasingly out of your depth.
Myself and Andyhinch get on just fine,and enjoy a mutual joke on occasion.
This is yet another thing that has precisely fuck all to do with you,as you clearly don't get the concept of humour.
Apparently we can't infer that you are utterly bonkers any more,so I won't.
But if you come on here spouting complete crap about a job that I have done and you haven't then you will get the reality check that you deserve. "
Paul - there is no point in trying to debate rationally with you,because you simply don't appear to be in any way capable of reasoned discussion like most normal people
You seldom read the posts of others properly,and simply cherry pick bits that you want to read,ie those that coincide with your cosy and simplistic worldview.
I joined this thread because I have relevant experience of social work,and know first hand how hard the job has become.
You then chose to wade in with no relevant experience whatsoever and had a go,inferring that I was wrong.
I think most posters will come to the conclusion that this makes you an ill-informed arrogant troll - nobody asked you to gatecrash the thread and show your ignorance,yet you come on here and have a go at both me and Zim who have actually done the job.
To be honest,you just bore me nowadays with your trite Ned Flanders tribute act,and your habit of reporting every other post when someone has the temerity to take issue with you,so in future I shall just ignore your inane ramblings,lest I get banned,as seemingly you are bulletproof on here,for reasons that escape me.
I think I was being very polite.
p.s. NF and Zinny, neither of you have given us an explanation as to how safeguarding will be replaced across all social work client groups and sectors.