Freestyler
Well-Known Member
fine as it is.
The structure of the roof was there over the open end; its just that the cladding wasn't fixed to the structure.bluestu1968 said:Wasn't there an open end during the Commonwealth games? what happened with the roof then?
EL APACHE TEVEZ said:I personally think we should wait a couple of years before we expand the stadium,we havn't the fan base to fill a 60 thousand stadium.
alera said:Not really if we want to compete at the highest level.
Maintainin said:Stevie B said:Presumably the expansion would start in the away end near the end of the season, bringing this to three tiers, with blues next to the away fans relocated, then once this is complete begin work on a third tier in the family stand (if demand is there)
![]()
![]()
LoveCity said:Entire upper tier would be empty right now if we had 60,000 seats, we simply do not have the fanbase to fill that sort of capacity except probably against the rags/Chelsea/Arsenal.
I'd love to see a bigger and better Etihad Stadium but it'd be embarrassing for the club if we expanded only to have empty seats in the new area. In 2005 it was said we had about 885k fans in UK (probably more now!) and most of them are probably in Manchester, so maybe before expanding the stadium, the brass needs to ask the question "How can we get more of those fans into the ground?".
I would happily take a season out if the club said "we are knocking down the East Stand and rebuilding it as a one tier'd super stand like the die Südtribüne at Borussia Dortmand!"Franny Lee's Barrel Chest said:Now then, it might well be the case that we expand the stadium and I think most people either in the know or who know anything about civil engineering are suggesting that the natural expansion is going to be the two ends into 3 tiers like the East and Colin Bell. I'm sure it will look great if that happens.
However, if that is the plan, I would have thought that it would take some time and that they would have to close part of the ground to accommodate this. If this is the case, what will the capacity be brought down to during that time and will this mean that we have a situation whereby some season ticket holders are unable to renew or even get into the ground owing to the reduced capacity? If that happens this board will surely explode.
It was bad enough when they were kicked out of the family stand....
Gary James said:My view is, and always will be, that we should extend the stadium asap.
Remember when we were at Maine Rd and the plans were first drawn up? We all expected a 60k stadium and were disappointed when we were told it'd be 50k. Then it ended up more like 47k.
Experience at a variety of clubs, most obviously at Arsenal and United, has proved that once there's momentum it all takes off and support rockets.
Old Trafford rarely sold out pre 1994 (apart from when capacity was severly restricted); same with Highbury and even St. James' Park & Roker Park, but their owners showed a bit of vision and built stadia/improved stadia that took their capacity to new heights.
So long as the stadium is enlarged to a plan that allows smaller attendances to be managed
(there are ways of closing off third tiers that limit the appearance of empty seats) we should go for an enlargement asap. Build it and they will come.
I know people get hung up on the fact we don't seem to sell out, but improving the stadium and its surrounds will help increase interest as well. There's a PR job to do to encourage people to attend who have perhaps not yet come to the stadium but regularly attended Maine Road.
There's no doubt that Champions League qualification and the FA Cup success has generated interest outside of City's normal support - take a look at all the people who have 'liked' my facebook page and you'll see there are a lot of fans who claim support for City who you would not have expected a few years ago. If that continues, which I'm sure it will, then it's clear the stadium would need to be increased no matter what. Add a hotel and other facilities and the game will become part of a package - some will say that's not what football should be but regardless of that, that's the way the game has been going since the PL was formed.
Increase the stadium now and then work hard to fill it.
In 1922 people thought City's directors were mad when they planned for a 80k stadium - our average was a lot lower than it is today - and yet within 6 months of opening it had attracted 76,166 for a game. It was a one off (though there were other large attendances) but no one had ever envisaged Manchester housing such a crowd (it eclipsed all attendances at OT and was greater than 3 FA Cup finals that had been played in the area).
Build it and they will come.
EDIT: Meant to add - as for enlarging the stadium and its impact on capacity. I am certainly no expert and have no idea on technical issues, but once the balancing issue of the roof is sorted out I reckon it would be possible to keep capacity at a similar level to now by building behind the two ends. There would be safety issues, but I reckon it would be possible to reduce capacity a little - and have an uncovered stand - but build behind and above as they did with the 2nd and 3rd tiers of the Kippax during the 1994-95 season (remember on match days they opened an unroofed 1st tier, then 2nd tier).
LoveCity said:Entire upper tier would be empty right now if we had 60,000 seats, we simply do not have the fanbase to fill that sort of capacity except probably against the rags/Chelsea/Arsenal.
I'd love to see a bigger and better Etihad Stadium but it'd be embarrassing for the club if we expanded only to have empty seats in the new area. In 2005 it was said we had about 885k fans in UK (probably more now!) and most of them are probably in Manchester, so maybe before expanding the stadium, the brass needs to ask the question "How can we get more of those fans into the ground?".
Unfortunatly, lads in their 20's like me who over the last decade have come to the age where we can get our own tickets.. well there just aren't that many of us. At school it was United who won everything while we got relegated. So only those who were proper City fans remained City fans. Until last season we'd only known City as a failure of a club. All the kids when I was at school who weren't that serious about football support, whose parents weren't into football so had no family ties to a club, all just followed United because they won stuff.philiph20 said:Looking at the average attendances since we moved in 2003 i am flabergasted that we averaged more in the first season than we did last year, we do indeed have static support and if anything it proves we have minimal day trippers.
The club have done a lot in my opinion to improve attendances at cup games but for whatever reason we do seem to have a lot of "can't be arsed" supporters it would seem, probably more than comparably sized clubs, no idea why this may be bearing in mind the changes in the alst few years...finance or lack of it?, lack of passion?????.
There must be tens of thousands of fans in Greater Manchester who used to do but haven't been for years the question is how do we attract them back.
philiph20 said:Looking at the average attendances since we moved in 2003 i am flabergasted that we averaged more in the first season than we did last year, we do indeed have static support and if anything it proves we have minimal day trippers.
The club have done a lot in my opinion to improve attendances at cup games but for whatever reason we do seem to have a lot of "can't be arsed" supporters it would seem, probably more than comparably sized clubs, no idea why this may be bearing in mind the changes in the alst few years...finance or lack of it?, lack of passion?????.
There must be tens of thousands of fans in Greater Manchester who used to do but haven't been for years the question is how do we attract them back.